why they abusing deepfakes? look nothing wrong with deepfakes but if the community can't keep that stuff to a minimum, the system is literally ;scale tilted in so many fricken ways in the favor of congress and such that yes it would be a huge problem.

Based on standard community and software development norms, RudBo's report is NOT inappropriate. RudBo appears to be acting as a typical, helpful user in a beta or community-driven environment. Here is the breakdown of why their actions are valid:

1. The "Cat is Out of the Bag" Factor MotionMuse's main argument is that RudBo is revealing a secret that could hurt the platform. However, RudBo states: "it’s now discussed in reddit, discord, major gens…"

• Appropriate: Since the issue is already widespread and public on other platforms, RudBo isn't "leaking" a secret. They are simply documenting the current status of a known issue on the official forum.
• Context: Trying to hide a bug that hundreds of users are already experiencing usually leads to more confusion, not less.

2. Standard Bug Reporting Etiquette RudBo followed the standard template for a helpful bug report:

• Clear Title: "[Bug] image gen glitch..."
• Scope: Identified that it affects "multiple gen and multiple users."
• Duration: Noted it has been happening for "3 days."
• Symptom: Described the output (glitching, unrelated to prompt) without posting the offensive images themselves.
• No Malice: They didn't post the NSFW images or teach people how to force the glitch; they simply warned that it was happening.

3. Responsible Disclosure vs. Public Discussion There is a concept in tech called "Responsible Disclosure" (telling the developer privately about security holes). MotionMuse thinks this applies here.

• Why RudBo is right: This isn't a security hack or a data leak; it's a service quality issue. When a service creates bad output, users naturally ask, "Is this happening to anyone else?" Public confirmation (like vvren and GlassGuy provided) saves everyone time by confirming it's a server-side bug, not a user error.

4. Self-Moderation RudBo admits, "I deleted it myself," referring to a previous post. This shows RudBo is conscientious and willing to take down content if they feel it wasn't helpful. This directly contradicts MotionMuse's characterization of them as reckless. Summary RudBo is in the right. They are treating the forum as a place to track service health. MotionMuse is treating the forum as a PR channel that needs to be managed to avoid "cancel culture." While MotionMuse's fears (about regulation/shutdown) might be genuine, they are unfairly taking that anxiety out on RudBo, who is just reporting a bug.

I deleted it myself.