104
submitted 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) by LemmySlopSkimmer@hexbear.net to c/slop@hexbear.net

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Awoo@hexbear.net 83 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Yoooooo thank you Slrpnk for this thread because I totally missed that earlier thread criticising parts of Piefed's code and OMFG it's bad and full of shit that is the dev's personal feelings deliberately hidden and it deliberately gives misleading errors to prevent you discovering what it's actually doing.

If a dev is deliberately obfuscating their errors to hide what their fucking service is actually doing you should run the fuck away. That is not a good or honest dev.

Like, I wouldn't have used it to begin with but having your code do one thing and then telling the user it's doing something else screams malicious developer.


EDIT:

As Edie mentioned, if someone has a user blocked, and that user replies to someone, their comment is dropped:

if parent_comment.author.has_blocked_user(user.id) or parent_comment.author.has_blocked_instance(user.instance_id):

log_incoming_ap(id, APLOG_CREATE, APLOG_FAILURE, saved_json, 'Parent comment author blocked replier')

return None

For Example:

Cowbees comment on lemmy.ml: https://lemmy.ml/post/41587312/23288779

Non-existent on piefed.social: https://piefed.social/comment/9647830

(see Edies original comment here)

This enables deeply deeply malicious behaviour not to mention being malicious in its own right. One blocked user is blocking ALL users. You could make an account on piefed, block the entire fediverse, and Piefed will then drop all of it lmao.

The ideological purpose of this that the dev has is so that the invested people who actually take time to learn this (anticommunists) can block any leftists across the fediverse and function as a secret and hidden element of blocking left wing content.

Deeply malicious developer is an understatement.

If you're an anarchist or a socdem or a whatever don't think this doesn't apply to you and that it will only be used against communists, anyone even vaguely leftwing will be blocked by people who know this function exists and all of your shit will never appear there. It is a platform that will make the left completely invisible if you do not exist directly on it. But you better bet that if you exist on it and say the wrong thing that's slightly further left than what they approve of they'll come down on you too.

[-] edie@lemmy.encryptionin.space 35 points 2 months ago

One blocked user is blocking ALL users. You could make an account on piefed, block the entire fediverse, and Piefed will then drop all of it lmao.

Only in reply to you, either direct comment replies or if you are the poster then anywhere in the comments.


This user is suspected of being a cat. Please report any suspicious behavior.

[-] commieradcat@hexbear.net 4 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

That sounds like a good feature?

If I blocked someone I dont want them commenting on everything I post and harassing me, especially if I can’t event see it but everyone else. Is that how Lemmy works?

[-] edie@lemmy.encryptionin.space 24 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

No, Lemmy allows someone you've blocked to reply to you, and everyone else can see it.

Also, if it was just local, it wouldn't be as big of a problem, then the ui can inform people that they can't reply and they can then figure out what to do. The problem is that federated users can create comments that they dont realize will never show up.


This user is suspected of being a cat. Please report any suspicious behavior.

[-] Damarcusart@hexbear.net 8 points 2 months ago

My least favourite lemmy feature. I don't like blocking people at all, because I'm worried about people saying things behind my back that I can't see. It seems like it would only give control to the blocked person, not the blocker.

[-] commieradcat@hexbear.net 8 points 2 months ago

Exactly, it opens you up to slander. They could be saying all sorts of nasty things about you to other people and you can't even defend yourself from the allegations, and no one reading it will know you had them blocked.

[-] astutemural@midwest.social 5 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Oh no! Not other people on the internet saying bad things about my anonymous account! How will my reputation ever recover?!

[-] commieradcat@hexbear.net 3 points 2 months ago

Oh, that's not good. I like the PieFed method more here.

[-] Blakey@hexbear.net 18 points 2 months ago

It sounds like piefed effectively shadowbans responders, though. Preventing people from replying to users who blocked them is the best implementation, but letting people think they've replied and silently hiding the replies, without even a message letting you know you've been blocked, is possibly the worst.

I could be wrong about it because this is all incredibly confusing to me.

[-] commieradcat@hexbear.net 0 points 2 months ago

I would prefer a harasser not being able to comment and not know over a harasser being able to comment and me not knowing.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (20 replies)
load more comments (57 replies)
this post was submitted on 30 Jan 2026
104 points (97.3% liked)

Slop.

840 readers
595 users here now

For posting all the anonymous reactionary bullshit that you can't post anywhere else.

Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.

Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.

Rule 3: No sectarianism.

Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome

Rule 5: No bigotry of any kind, including ironic bigotry.

Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.

Rule 7: Do not individually target federated instances' admins or moderators.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS