996
submitted 1 month ago by Redditsux@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] danc4498@lemmy.world 237 points 1 month ago

Maybe if he says it enough times they’ll leave. Or maybe he should enforce the law in his state.

[-] U7826391786239@lemmy.zip 96 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

he knows trump wants to declare martial law. and he knows trump could have him and his entire family murdered with one phone call. everyone's waiting for someone to step up and show some leadership against fascism, and if it ever happens, it's definitely not going to be someone in public office

[-] SwingingTheLamp@piefed.zip 53 points 1 month ago

and he knows trump could have him and his entire family murdered with one phone call.

Yes, [REDACTED] brought up the Hortman assassination a propos of nothing on social media, and within 12 hours, Walz dropped out of the governor's race quite unexpectedly. That was my first thought, that the regime has made its threat clear to him.

[-] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 41 points 1 month ago

We have a federal government that is using mob/cartel tactics to terrorize people into submission.

This is not okay.

[-] Whostosay@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 month ago

I'll take no shit for five dollars, Alex

[-] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 6 points 1 month ago

What is constipation, Trebek?

[-] Whostosay@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 month ago

Haha that's awesome

[-] danc4498@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago

I think he should never have run. It would have been an unprecedented 3rd term.

[-] UnspecificGravity@piefed.social 35 points 1 month ago

Then what the fuck is this guy even for?

[-] U7826391786239@lemmy.zip 28 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

to make it look like there's someone in charge who gives a rat's ass about you. that's usually fine--but not when a fascist con man rapist sack of shit is president. it doesn't matter how many innocent citizens are murdered--walz will do nothing beyond complaining about it .

[-] arrow74@lemmy.zip 34 points 1 month ago

We're kinda at the do nothing and be murdered or do something and then maybe get killed for it stage.

Starting to seem like trying is the better option

[-] Montagge@lemmy.zip 22 points 1 month ago

Sometimes it's better to die on your feet rather than your knees.

[-] Sektor@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

Talk the talk.

[-] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world -4 points 1 month ago

If we really honestly can’t figure out a better plan than to get our little glocks and go plink at em, then okay. But we’d have to be a whole lot dumber than I think we are.

[-] Montagge@lemmy.zip 16 points 1 month ago

I'm all ears on how your going to reason with might makes right peole to give up their power

[-] itistime@infosec.pub 5 points 1 month ago

If the money is corrupting all players and steering the agenda, why not go after it? When we strike directly at agents of force, then we are directly attacking family and friends of a multitude of others, including of folks that may be trying to reconcile things. It will rile up his base into murder frenzy. Many undecided (dummies) will get swept up in the frenzy, because they’ll defer thinking to others around them. The rabid base have few relationships with their oligarch masters.

Lobotomize their think tanks.

Cut out the tongues of their media propagandists.

Bring any and all levels of direct action against the class that is causing this.

[-] Whostosay@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 month ago

Plinking at them with our little glocks worked for 20 years in the Middle East.

Don't ever underestimate will.

[-] AbidanYre@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

Pretty sure they were plinking with AKs and RPGs

[-] Whostosay@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 month ago

Small arms is small arms

[-] cheesybuddha@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

The Vietnamese did it and they were trapped in a cave with a bunch of scrap metal.

[-] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

The Vietnamese were bad ass. But they didn’t have to fight facebook.

[-] ChunkMcHorkle@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago

No, you're right. We're being brigaded. A lot of accounts popping up out of nowhere with faulty -- to be generous -- knowledge of the US.

[-] Whostosay@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 month ago

Buy a weapon before they close that pipeline.

[-] wallabra@lemmy.eco.br 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I mean on the other hand, Trump kind of does want violent resistance to spring up so provide the Reichstag burning he's been waiting for to amplify the cracking down. I mean, they kinda already had the Charlie Kirk shooting, and he kind of already can institute martial law whenever (it's not constitutional but neither has been a single thing he's done lately), and martial law won't really lead to anything on its own anyway... I dunno, let's keep resisting in effective ways. One idea is to make ICE's life hell so they loathe their jobs and go home.

[-] Whostosay@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 month ago

I've got a better idea, go to one of the net worth websites, take your pick and make some real change happen.

[-] wallabra@lemmy.eco.br 1 points 1 month ago
[-] Whostosay@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 month ago

Eating the rich is an effective way is my point

[-] wallabra@lemmy.eco.br 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Well yes that's the main part of the plan, of course

[-] CmdrShepard49@sh.itjust.works 15 points 1 month ago

These people literally ran for office specifically to represent the people. They shouldn't be shy about putting things on the line

[-] queermunist@lemmy.ml 45 points 1 month ago

Unfortunately, Democrats have done nothing to build any forces loyal to democracy. They supported racist and violent cops that are loyal to Republicans, and those cops almost certainly won't follow orders to arrest ICE agents. If anything they're just going to collaborate, like they already have despite it technically being illegal. National Guard might be better, maybe, but they're probably just going to help ICE suppress the protestors.

Who would he call upon to enforce the law?

[-] aesthelete@lemmy.world 25 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

The big myth that nobody analyzes nor tries to dispel in politics is that police (of any type) operate under democratic control.

They never have, and until qualified immunity is eliminated, they never will.

Elected officials (outside of the president...or hey, wait a second, couldn't Walz pardon himself for state crimes?!) do not have such an immunity. So, the "orders" that the elected officials give police are basically suggestions, and that is how they receive and follow (or don't follow) them.

[-] ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net 26 points 1 month ago

Police in US is pretty much an organized crime group. If a politician threatens their status they all will simply go on strike. Reminds of when de Blasio supported protests against police killings and every cop turned his back on him during his speech.

[-] Whostosay@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 month ago

If the police go on strike, our problems are solved. The police doing nothing is the best case scenario.

[-] Deceptichum@quokk.au 26 points 1 month ago

He needs to click his heels three times first. That’s why it’s not working.

[-] dan1101@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago

Wonder if it would work to declare a state of emergency and mobilize the MN national guard to safeguard civilians? If they are already deployed can the president deploy them?

[-] peopleproblems@lemmy.world 16 points 1 month ago

They've already been mobilized. They're guarding the Whipple Concentration Camp.

[-] kadu@scribe.disroot.org 4 points 1 month ago

Got downvoted for claiming all he and other democrats were going to do was angrily Tweet.

They angrily Tweeted and made phone calls.

How surprising.

this post was submitted on 24 Jan 2026
996 points (99.3% liked)

News

36118 readers
3076 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS