this post was submitted on 29 Aug 2023
21 points (100.0% liked)
chat
8163 readers
317 users here now
Chat is a text only community for casual conversation, please keep shitposting to the absolute minimum. This is intended to be a separate space from c/chapotraphouse or the daily megathread. Chat does this by being a long-form community where topics will remain from day to day unlike the megathread, and it is distinct from c/chapotraphouse in that we ask you to engage in this community in a genuine way. Please keep shitposting, bits, and irony to a minimum.
As with all communities posts need to abide by the code of conduct, additionally moderators will remove any posts or comments deemed to be inappropriate.
Thank you and happy chatting!
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Can you please provide some source for the strontium and carbon-14? I want to do more reading about this. Besides the IAEA report, most testaments come from physicists, who are not marine biologist or ecologists.
I'm of the opinion that we shouldn't generally dump stuff into the ocean, it is not ours to touch, but instead home to a different world of vastly many species we don't know of. I think they are monitoring marine species over time, but I feel like this whole thing is misguided anthropocentrism and if in 2 or 3 decades, there is deviation to marine ecosystems, this whole ordeal was not worth it.
Greenpeace Japan references (reference 2):
This is accompanied with a link to the position paper
Further quote:
IAEA is also a complete Western tool like almost all other international organizations
Again really weird how so many people chose to trust them here
Just let them revert to their old selves. Better they show their hand on this issue rather than a more directly damaging one