Let me lay this out for you: you've seen a screenshot - which may be real, or may not be, since screenshots are easy to fake - which backs a narrative which you and this service generally buy into. When that is pushed back on you don't go, "huh, yeah I guess this might not be the slam dunk it's presented as" but instead dig your heels in.
I booted up a windows machine and checked, and the first suggestion is the terminal application. I don't know if the difference is due to trickery or misconfiguration, but I do know that it's not particularly supportive of the narrative that you clearly subscribe to when a bunch of people don't even get the supposed bad behaviour.
Assuming that all the people who don't get the same result just turned off some option: my Linux laptop had an issue where it didn't work properly with monitors behind MST hubs. I spent hours finding an imperfect workaround and dealing with said imperfections until eventually (years later) it was fixed. In comparison, finding and disabling whatever option this might be controlled by takes a few minutes (I assume - like I said, I can't remember disabling it, if indeed I did, but I'm sure it wasn't complicated else I would remember)
Now, I still prefer Linux; it's the right trade-off for me most of the time. But y'all could stand to be less fuckin religious about it. Most people, I would think, would take the 5 minutes to google and disable something they don't like over the hours of time I've wasted for this one issue.