you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 28 points 10 months ago (8 children)

they have no obligation to reveal any part of it that would indicate your innocence

So you just don't understand how the legal system works at all, amigo. What you described is completely false. One of the first phases of any court case is discovery, where the opposing party supplies the evidence that they have to support their case. Not including this type of evidence during discovery could get an attorney disbarred and a court case thrown out entirely.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 17 points 10 months ago (7 children)

    To expand on that, the prosecution wouldn't have an obligation to reveal that evidence to the jury, but they would have an obligation to provide it to the court and/or defense during discovery. And, you know, that seems like something the defense would both use and request if it were missing.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [+] -13 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (6 children)
  • [–] 6 points 10 months ago (5 children)

    Then that snippet wouldn't be admissible in court.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [+] -4 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (4 children)
  • [–] 7 points 10 months ago (3 children)

    If the prosecution obtains it as evidence, I would think evidence handling procedure would make said discarding a no-go.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [+] -6 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (2 children)