43
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 11 Dec 2025
43 points (100.0% liked)
Slop.
793 readers
540 users here now
For posting all the anonymous reactionary bullshit that you can't post anywhere else.
Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.
Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.
Rule 3: No sectarianism.
Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome
Rule 5: No bigotry of any kind, including ironic bigotry.
Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.
Rule 7: Do not individually target federated instances' admins or moderators.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
[Ed.: emoji added for emphasis. I couldn't resist]
Since LLMs don't deal with meaning, the work of creating meaning is partly done by the past writers whose work was ingested, but also very much by the reader. This is not unlike scapulomancy or Tarot reading, only the role of the reader is obscured, because the message from the bot falsely appears complete.
I think this comment really encapsulates why people doing computer touching degrees should be forced to study at least a little bit of literary analysis or philosophy. Because you make an excellent point which I guarantee LLM hype artists like the author will never consider.