853
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] TheAlbatross@lemmy.blahaj.zone 67 points 2 months ago

The peace prize did seem pretty pointless since Obama won it for doing nothing. Like don't get me wrong I voted for the guy and wanted him to win, but it was pretty dang empty to give him the peace prize, especially since he then went on to be in charge while some really ugly stuff went down.

[-] NOT_RICK@lemmy.world 34 points 2 months ago

Yeah in hindsight it was a silly award that felt like a “thanks for not being Bush and Cheney” prize.

[-] DaMummy@lemmy.world 10 points 2 months ago

Now look into how many bombs were dropped under Bush/Chaney, and then how many were dropped under Obama. You'll quickly understand what the Nobel Peace Prize was for.

[-] UnspecificGravity@piefed.social 6 points 2 months ago

Or, you know, that 8 years is longer than 6 years.

[-] NOT_RICK@lemmy.world 8 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

You’re saying that there was no Afghan war for the first 10 months of Bush’s admin and no Iraq war for the first two I take it?

Even with that factored in, from what I can tell the Bush admin dropped nearly double (100k for Obama vs 200k for Bush), although I’m not sure where they’re sourcing their information from.

[-] TheAlbatross@lemmy.blahaj.zone 11 points 2 months ago

It's a weird argument, because he got the peace prize really early into his presidency; before he could have an impact to get America to drop 100k bombs vs 200k, but also dropping a hundred thousand bombs seems like a hundred thousand more bombs than one would have to drop to be called a paragon of peace...

[-] NOT_RICK@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

Oh for sure, I just don’t think it makes sense to imply he was worse than the people that created the mess in the first place who also happened to drop more bombs.

[-] DaMummy@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

Where are you getting your numbers from, cause what I'm seeing is that America dropped way more bombs under Obama than under Bush.

[-] NOT_RICK@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

I think I’m wrong upon further review because Obama pulled back from ground commitments and compensated with bombing campaigns. From what I can tell the Isis bombing campaigns really brought his count up as well.

[-] nednobbins@lemmy.zip 32 points 2 months ago

They gave it to Kissinger too.

[-] TheAlbatross@lemmy.blahaj.zone 12 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Oh wow that's really gross, I had no idea

[-] Passerby6497@lemmy.world 8 points 2 months ago

The fact that they gave the peace prize to that fucking war criminal says all you need to know.

[-] 3abas@lemmy.world 21 points 2 months ago

He didn't do nothing, he specialized in illegal drone strikes.

[-] deHaga@feddit.uk 11 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

They gave him the peace prize way before that though. Almost like a prize for winning the election

[-] TheAlbatross@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 2 months ago

Yeah, this was my point with the "nothing" statement. Obama oversaw and approved some absolutely horrendous things.

[-] deHaga@feddit.uk 3 points 2 months ago

Yep, drone strikes meant killing without having to worry about bad news cycles with dead Americans

this post was submitted on 11 Dec 2025
853 points (99.1% liked)

World News

54073 readers
2016 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS