▲ 505 ▼ Anon asks out a friend (sh.itjust.works) submitted 11 months ago by Early_To_Risa@sh.itjust.works [M] to c/greentext@sh.itjust.works 196 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 11 months ago (2 children) i think this isn't the main point of this meme. he's hurt because he wanted to have a sweet teenage romance (or what feels like it) with that girl. that's not possible anymore. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Dorkyd68@lemmy.world 19 points 11 months ago (1 child) I get what you're saying. But if it's so irrelevant then why bring it up?? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de -21 points 11 months ago (3 children) people are allowed free speech permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] Peruvian_Skies@sh.itjust.works 26 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (2 children) This is a deflection, not an answer. He's also allowed to say she refuses to wear a T-rex costume in bed, but if it's irrelevant why say it? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] rooroo@feddit.org 10 points 11 months ago* I mean not wearing a T-Rex costume to bed could be a dealbreaker for an intimate relationship. I’d find it more understandable than the number of former partners. permalink fedilink source parent [–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago okay see that right there is a valid reason permalink fedilink source parent [–] Dorkyd68@lemmy.world 19 points 11 months ago This is the dumbest response to a question I've ever received. You deserve a cookie permalink fedilink source parent [–] WoodScientist@lemmy.world 6 points 11 months ago (1 child) We should pass a law making it legal that whenever someone deflects an argument with a non-sequitur appeal to "free speech" that they be hauled up on top of a giant pyramid and have their beating heart ripped out with an obsidian knife, their life a sacrifice to the great Sun god. If you have any objections to my batshit insane proposal, you hate free speech and are a traitor to America... and Huītzilōpōchtli. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de 0 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 child) funny response, i give you that. edit: but the difference is that yours is inciting violence. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] IDraw4u@sh.itjust.works 3 points 11 months ago Nice pearls, but you need not clutch them so permalink fedilink source parent [–] Korhaka@sopuli.xyz 12 points 11 months ago (1 child) Teenage romance in your mid 20s? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] bytesonbike@discuss.online 5 points 11 months ago (1 child) Well technically OP is now 30 so they're less of a teenage figuring things out, and sad person. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Korhaka@sopuli.xyz 8 points 11 months ago (1 child) Yeah but before the 5 years later they would be mid 20s. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de 9 points 11 months ago* (1 child) some people grow up slowly and make typical teenage experiences in their mid-20s :) i know that because i'm one of them. :) permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 6 points 11 months ago my dude we all got our own paths and timing. don't rush. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Dorkyd68@lemmy.world 19 points 11 months ago (1 child) I get what you're saying. But if it's so irrelevant then why bring it up?? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de -21 points 11 months ago (3 children) people are allowed free speech permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] Peruvian_Skies@sh.itjust.works 26 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (2 children) This is a deflection, not an answer. He's also allowed to say she refuses to wear a T-rex costume in bed, but if it's irrelevant why say it? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] rooroo@feddit.org 10 points 11 months ago* I mean not wearing a T-Rex costume to bed could be a dealbreaker for an intimate relationship. I’d find it more understandable than the number of former partners. permalink fedilink source parent [–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago okay see that right there is a valid reason permalink fedilink source parent [–] Dorkyd68@lemmy.world 19 points 11 months ago This is the dumbest response to a question I've ever received. You deserve a cookie permalink fedilink source parent [–] WoodScientist@lemmy.world 6 points 11 months ago (1 child) We should pass a law making it legal that whenever someone deflects an argument with a non-sequitur appeal to "free speech" that they be hauled up on top of a giant pyramid and have their beating heart ripped out with an obsidian knife, their life a sacrifice to the great Sun god. If you have any objections to my batshit insane proposal, you hate free speech and are a traitor to America... and Huītzilōpōchtli. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de 0 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 child) funny response, i give you that. edit: but the difference is that yours is inciting violence. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] IDraw4u@sh.itjust.works 3 points 11 months ago Nice pearls, but you need not clutch them so permalink fedilink source parent
[+] gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de -21 points 11 months ago (3 children) people are allowed free speech permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] Peruvian_Skies@sh.itjust.works 26 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (2 children) This is a deflection, not an answer. He's also allowed to say she refuses to wear a T-rex costume in bed, but if it's irrelevant why say it? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] rooroo@feddit.org 10 points 11 months ago* I mean not wearing a T-Rex costume to bed could be a dealbreaker for an intimate relationship. I’d find it more understandable than the number of former partners. permalink fedilink source parent [–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago okay see that right there is a valid reason permalink fedilink source parent [–] Dorkyd68@lemmy.world 19 points 11 months ago This is the dumbest response to a question I've ever received. You deserve a cookie permalink fedilink source parent [–] WoodScientist@lemmy.world 6 points 11 months ago (1 child) We should pass a law making it legal that whenever someone deflects an argument with a non-sequitur appeal to "free speech" that they be hauled up on top of a giant pyramid and have their beating heart ripped out with an obsidian knife, their life a sacrifice to the great Sun god. If you have any objections to my batshit insane proposal, you hate free speech and are a traitor to America... and Huītzilōpōchtli. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de 0 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 child) funny response, i give you that. edit: but the difference is that yours is inciting violence. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] IDraw4u@sh.itjust.works 3 points 11 months ago Nice pearls, but you need not clutch them so permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Peruvian_Skies@sh.itjust.works 26 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (2 children) This is a deflection, not an answer. He's also allowed to say she refuses to wear a T-rex costume in bed, but if it's irrelevant why say it? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] rooroo@feddit.org 10 points 11 months ago* I mean not wearing a T-Rex costume to bed could be a dealbreaker for an intimate relationship. I’d find it more understandable than the number of former partners. permalink fedilink source parent [–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago okay see that right there is a valid reason permalink fedilink source parent
[–] rooroo@feddit.org 10 points 11 months ago* I mean not wearing a T-Rex costume to bed could be a dealbreaker for an intimate relationship. I’d find it more understandable than the number of former partners. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago okay see that right there is a valid reason permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Dorkyd68@lemmy.world 19 points 11 months ago This is the dumbest response to a question I've ever received. You deserve a cookie permalink fedilink source parent
[–] WoodScientist@lemmy.world 6 points 11 months ago (1 child) We should pass a law making it legal that whenever someone deflects an argument with a non-sequitur appeal to "free speech" that they be hauled up on top of a giant pyramid and have their beating heart ripped out with an obsidian knife, their life a sacrifice to the great Sun god. If you have any objections to my batshit insane proposal, you hate free speech and are a traitor to America... and Huītzilōpōchtli. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de 0 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 child) funny response, i give you that. edit: but the difference is that yours is inciting violence. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] IDraw4u@sh.itjust.works 3 points 11 months ago Nice pearls, but you need not clutch them so permalink fedilink source parent
[–] gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de 0 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 child) funny response, i give you that. edit: but the difference is that yours is inciting violence. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] IDraw4u@sh.itjust.works 3 points 11 months ago Nice pearls, but you need not clutch them so permalink fedilink source parent
[–] IDraw4u@sh.itjust.works 3 points 11 months ago Nice pearls, but you need not clutch them so permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Korhaka@sopuli.xyz 12 points 11 months ago (1 child) Teenage romance in your mid 20s? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] bytesonbike@discuss.online 5 points 11 months ago (1 child) Well technically OP is now 30 so they're less of a teenage figuring things out, and sad person. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Korhaka@sopuli.xyz 8 points 11 months ago (1 child) Yeah but before the 5 years later they would be mid 20s. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de 9 points 11 months ago* (1 child) some people grow up slowly and make typical teenage experiences in their mid-20s :) i know that because i'm one of them. :) permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 6 points 11 months ago my dude we all got our own paths and timing. don't rush. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] bytesonbike@discuss.online 5 points 11 months ago (1 child) Well technically OP is now 30 so they're less of a teenage figuring things out, and sad person. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Korhaka@sopuli.xyz 8 points 11 months ago (1 child) Yeah but before the 5 years later they would be mid 20s. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de 9 points 11 months ago* (1 child) some people grow up slowly and make typical teenage experiences in their mid-20s :) i know that because i'm one of them. :) permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 6 points 11 months ago my dude we all got our own paths and timing. don't rush. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Korhaka@sopuli.xyz 8 points 11 months ago (1 child) Yeah but before the 5 years later they would be mid 20s. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de 9 points 11 months ago* (1 child) some people grow up slowly and make typical teenage experiences in their mid-20s :) i know that because i'm one of them. :) permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 6 points 11 months ago my dude we all got our own paths and timing. don't rush. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de 9 points 11 months ago* (1 child) some people grow up slowly and make typical teenage experiences in their mid-20s :) i know that because i'm one of them. :) permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 6 points 11 months ago my dude we all got our own paths and timing. don't rush. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 6 points 11 months ago my dude we all got our own paths and timing. don't rush. permalink fedilink source parent