this post was submitted on 27 Jun 2023
318 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37742 readers
500 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] HobbitFoot 28 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Because we've all come to accept that Elon Musk doesn't know how to run a social media site?

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago (3 children)

He knows how to run a social media site into the ground...

Which is probably the whole point. Make it seem like the site is failing because of mismanagement, and not that its failure was intended right from the start with a leveraged buyout saddling the business with an untenable $13bn of debt.

[–] HobbitFoot 6 points 1 year ago

No, he's just dumb!

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yup, it's easy to forget that an important use of Twitter used to be finding out what was happening when propaganda was covering it up. It's how we learned about Arab spring.

If my life were at risk from my government, I certainly wouldn't trust Elon to keep me safe from them.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

The Arab Spring is exactly one if the reasons Musk took over the site. That, and Peter Thiel's (Musk's old partner from PayPal) failed attempts at setting up a rival service.

They couldn't rope Twitter into line, they couldn't make a competing service, so instead they saddled Twitter with $13bn of debt so that it would die (or step into line if they felt like paying off the debt).

It's the same way Toys R Us went under.

Musk's antics over the last few months have been nothing but a distraction. The very purchase itself was a death sentence.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

I don't know that he does.

We're still hearing about twitter and people are still using it.

I think what we're learning is that social media has more inertia than we might have thought, and it's actually incredibly difficult to kill it. This is a very bad thing as it allows someone like Musk to deeply alt-rightify what is fundamentally a public resource in private hands, but people will keep using it because...? I couldn't tell you why really, and I think most of us that have adopted lemmy are by nature not likely to really understand it.