60
submitted 6 months ago by Wordplay@hexbear.net to c/main@hexbear.net

We've been witnessing a coordinated ideological project unfold for the last five years, and the left appears to have ceded the field almost entirely.

Between 2020-2021, estimates for excess mortality (globally) range from 5 million to 14 million and beyond.

Pharmaceutical companies raked in hundreds of billions over the same period, some portion of which inevitably was subject to capital spillage -- and during the same time there was vaccine apartheid and a strict favoring of IP against life across the globe.

Wealth inequality became significantly more compounded over the period during and after the official recognition of the ongoing pandemic; and so on.

And what do we now see in this year 2025? An onslaught of books and articles from ostensibly liberal and left-liberal publishers that discuss how a tepid government response with halfhearted lockdowns was a 'overreaction based on bad models and evidence' where the costs outweighed the benefits. That mask mandates were in many cases probably too heavy handed. That the pandemic either was never very deadly in the first place, or quickly became flu-like in its virulence.

See 'An Abundance of Caution' published by MIT Press.

See 'In Covid's Wake', published by Princeton Press.


But based on Biden's term and the sociological production of the 'end of the pandemic', this liberal revisionism has been mounting for years. This rewriting of history comes as no surprise.

What I am surprised about, however, is the vacuum of useful literature on the left -- where is the Marxist analysis of this critical historical moment?

We had a real-time demonstration of:

  • How capitalism prioritizes profit over public health
  • The mechanics of disaster capitalism in action
  • State power mobilized for capital while abandoning workers
  • International solidarity crushed by IP regimes
  • The manufacture of consent around "acceptable" death rates

But beyond Radhika Desai's Capitalism, Coronavirus and War and scattered podcast episodes, I've found virtually nothing.

Did I miss something? Does history move too quickly for us?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] miz@hexbear.net 26 points 6 months ago

What we see during COVID-19 is stark operational differences between nations where politicians are the top authorities, and nations where Capital is the top authority. We are endlessly told that nations with activist governments are unfree, and that any support for these governments must come from either a pathological culture of obedience or the threat of state violence. And yet socialist nations plainly outperformed capitalist ones in terms of fighting the virus. [12]

This analysis does not imply there were simply two modes of response: capitalist and socialist. Market domination is not a binary affair, and Capital doesn’t rule by decree. As Roberts puts it, the market doesn’t tell capitalists what to do — rather, they have to guess and prognosticate and forecast and hope. Capitalists don’t find out whether they did what the market wanted until after the fact. [13] People around the world defended themselves from the virus, repressing the political will of Capital, in proportion to what they could get away with politically and economically. In socialist states, resources were deployed as deemed necessary to meet the challenge. In capitalist states in the sphere of influence of socialist China, such as South Korea, capitalists offered a decent response, perhaps because catastrophic handling would create a domestic political shift in favour of socialism. In the imperial core, where white supremacy reigns and there is no political will whatsoever to look to China for a good example, self-assured capitalists simply allowed the plague to spread essentially unopposed. In fact, imperialists succeeded to a great extent in turning the ensuing resentment into a foreign policy weapon. [14] This isn’t isolated to the most proudly capitalist nations; the kind of political power, infrastructure, and resources needed to enforce a tolerable quarantine has been completely eroded in social democratic havens like Canada and Sweden. No notable political force in the West referred to socialist successes in their efforts to affect domestic COVID-19 response policy, and I attribute this mistake to chauvinism.

from https://redsails.org/why-marxism/

this post was submitted on 14 Aug 2025
60 points (100.0% liked)

Main, home of the dope ass bear.

16116 readers
2 users here now

THE MAIN RULE: ALL TEXT POSTS MUST CONTAIN "MAIN" OR BE ENTIRELY IMAGES (INLINE OR EMOJI)

(Temporary moratorium on main rule to encourage more posting on main. We reserve the right to arbitrarily enforce it whenever we wish and the right to strike this line and enforce mainposting with zero notification to the users because its funny)

A hexbear.net commainity. Main sure to subscribe to other communities as well. Your feed will become the Lion's Main!

Good comrades mainly sort posts by hot and comments by new!


gun-unity State-by-state guide on maintaining firearm ownership

guaido Domain guide on mutual aid and foodbank resources

smoker-on-the-balcony Tips for looking at financials of non-profits (How to donate amainly)

frothingfash Community-sourced megapost on the main media sources to radicalize libs and chuds with

just-a-theory An Amainzing Organizing Story

feminism Main Source for Feminism for Babies

data-revolutionary Maintaining OpSec / Data Spring Cleaning guide


ussr-cry Remain up to date on what time is it in Moscow

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS