76
Pop science comparison tropes I'm tired of hearing
(hexbear.net)
It activates the same chemicals in your brain as cocaine! 
Well, yeah, there are only ~~three~~^[@[email protected] corrected me] a few neurotransmitters. That's not saying much.
You know what else activates those chemicals? Practically everything. When scientists breed "knockout" mice without dopamine, the mice just stand there until they die of thirst, because there is no reward for.... living.
It contains more germs than a toilet seat! 
Germs like moist surfaces. We don't want germs on our toilets, which is why we make them out of porcelain, which is hard, dry, non-porous, and easy to clean.
If it had more germs than your colon, then I would be concerned.
Don't make me go on a Lysenko rant
Darwin thought that each part of the body generated tiny particles that carried information on heritability to the sex organs
Darwin predicted DNA?
No comrade, Lamarck predicted epigenetics! /s
In reality they were all wrong to a significant degree and also usually contributed significantly to some aspect of what is taken for granted as the 'correct' scientific knowledge
For example, it's been known Mendel must have faked his data for almost a hundred years, but that doesn't make Mendelism wrong (after you strip out the stuff that is wrong)
Does Wikipedia have a license to peddle copium of this purity?