834
submitted 2 years ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

It uncovered eight WHO panelists involved with assessing safe levels of aspartame consumption who are beverage industry consultants who currently or previously worked with the alleged Coke front group, International Life Sciences Institute (Ilsi).

Their involvement in developing intake guidelines represents “an obvious conflict of interest”, said Gary Ruskin, US Right-To-Know’s executive director. “Because of this conflict of interest, [the daily intake] conclusions about aspartame are not credible, and the public should not rely on them,” he added.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] [email protected] 12 points 2 years ago

Why the fluoride? Only heard about it from the "the pineal gland is the eye of the soul" kind of people

[-] [email protected] -5 points 2 years ago

Dentists recommends using flouride, so naturally most people do. But I just feel uneasy about it.

[-] [email protected] 6 points 2 years ago
[-] [email protected] 0 points 2 years ago

It caused staining on my teeth so my dentist said to eat less sugar and brush correctly if I didn't want that. It's not really a big deal.

[-] [email protected] 5 points 2 years ago

What is your opinion on homosexuality in frogs?

this post was submitted on 17 Aug 2023
834 points (96.2% liked)

World News

36806 readers
546 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS