722
Efficency
(pawb.social)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 12 Jul 2025
722 points (99.3% liked)
Fuck AI
3448 readers
688 users here now
"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"
A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
For shared notes taking in a controlled environment - yes. It transparently happens anyway. For dynamic environments hosted by a separate service it's a whole other can of worms. You now seem to be fairly clear you're talking about the former, largely doable and indeed mostly implemented case. Nothing interesting left to talk about then.
Quite the reverse, actually. That "dynamic" environment hosted by a separate service is not nearly as significant as you portray it. The entire point of a meeting is for every observer to share the same experience.
Again, it is completely trivial for the underlying AI to recognize it has been asked to sit in on the same meeting, and act as the personal representative for each of 25 separate people.
If you're under the impression that there is a personal, private relationship between an individual and an AI instance, I suggest you disabuse yourself of that notion. If there is any distinction, it is only because the underlying AI has been instructed to schizophrenically simulate it.
Lol, well I can't say I'm surprised your bullishness on the matter persists - although I would argue that A) the current architectural model is a single process running the translation in a user-scoped session, and B) given that a bot literally can't recognise anything, any such implementation would be entirely conventional engineering, not waves hands AI voodoo magic. So I don't share your stance. But also I genuinely don't care, so that's as much attention as I'm prepared to give this particular thought experiment.