533
hmmm (lemmy.world)
submitted 2 days ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] [email protected] 24 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

It's not a CD-RW.

Not worth ibuying.

[-] [email protected] 17 points 2 days ago

CD-R works better in my car and Discman

[-] [email protected] 7 points 2 days ago

You have a discman? Cooooool!

[-] [email protected] 5 points 2 days ago

CD-RW quality only approached "worth a shit" around the time DVD-R became common, and still didn't work in most devices.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago

Lol, what about cd+rw? Didn't those have better compatibility?

[-] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I honestly could barely remember that there were two, let alone which was better.

I do remember the better one was pointlessly more expensive. For the same price, I could usually get twice as many CD-Rs when I needed more, although it might come down to whether I wanted them with cases or on a spindle.

[-] [email protected] 4 points 2 days ago

CD-RW was generally more of a gimmick than a useful format - especially once flash drives appeared and then doubled in size every several months.

CD-R was king for burning audio CDs or general data (until DVD-R came along).

[-] [email protected] 8 points 1 day ago

cd-rw were very useful when internets were dialled-up (or later ADSL) and you were working on large image files on different desktops

gimmick was the zip driveZIP 250 USB Drive

[-] [email protected] 5 points 1 day ago

CD-RW was the lifeblood of my mp3-discman, i just loved to be able to add songs i just discovered!

this post was submitted on 11 Jul 2025
533 points (98.9% liked)

hmmm

6295 readers
167 users here now

For things that are "hmmm".

Rule 1: All post titles except for meta posts should be just plain "hmmm" and nothing else, no emotes, no capitalisation, no extending it to "hmmmm" etc.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS