508
submitted 1 week ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago

That sort of argument would be more persuasive if it weren't for the existence all the other Free Software projects that get by just fine on grants and donations.

[-] HobbitFoot 3 points 1 week ago

Yeah, but then they wouldn't have the high headcount and power that they have.

[-] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago

And that sort of argument would be more persuasive if (a) I didn't think Mozilla was squandering the headcount they have, and (b) if I thought Mozilla actually had more power than other comparable orgs, like the Wikimedia Foundation.

[-] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago

Firefox is one of the most complex pieces of software on the planet at around 30 million lines of code (comparable to Chrome, WebKit and the Linux kernel). Personally, I think, it's a miracle they can maintain that with less than 700 devs. That's more than 40k lines of code per dev, most of which they won't have written themselves.

At $DAYJOB, we'll write 40k lines of code maybe in two years, with a team of 5+ devs. And having to maintain 10k lines of code is what I consider rather challenging, i.e. I'll likely start falling behind sooner or later, because the world around me moves faster than I can.

this post was submitted on 11 Jun 2025
508 points (98.7% liked)

Firefox

5413 readers
277 users here now

A community for discussion about Mozilla Firefox.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS