273
submitted 1 day ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] [email protected] 3 points 21 hours ago

Assuming it cost Microsoft $0 dollars to provide their AI services (this is up there with "Assuming all of physics stops working), and every dollar they make from Copilot was pure profit, it would take Microsoft 384 years to recoup one year of investment in AI.

And thats without even getting into the fact that in reality these services are so expensive to run that every time a customer uses them its a net loss to the provider.

When Amazon started out, no one had heard of them. Everyone has heard of Microsoft. Everyone already uses Microsoft's products. Everyone has heard about AI. It's the only thing in tech that anyone is talking about. It's hard to see how they could be doing more to market this. Same story with OpenAI, Facebook, Google, basically every player in this space.

Even if they can solve the efficiency problems to the point where they can actually make a profit off of these things, there just isn't enough interest. AI does plenty of things that are useful, but nothing that's truly vital, and it needs to be vital to have any hope of making back the money that's gone into it.

At present, there simply is not a path to profitability that doesn't rely on unicorn farts and pixie dust.

[-] [email protected] -3 points 15 hours ago

The companies developing ai don't need to make a profit just the same as Amazon didn't. They are in the development phase. Profit is not a big concern.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 9 hours ago

You're being incredibly dense.

The point is that they need to eventually make a profit that is commensurate to the investments they have put in, and right now there is absolutely no feasible path to them doing so. Any plan for eventual profitability relies entirely on magical thinking.

[-] [email protected] -1 points 7 hours ago

Are we going to start with insults? Not surprised.

There is absolutely no feasible path? I think that's not a serious statement. There is a feasible path and the progress is noticeable. Better chips, that use less power, optimized models, there are new ideas coming in and being tested so fast it's hard to follow.

Profitability will probably happen, might not, but the resources spent will advance practically every field of science.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 6 hours ago

I mean how can you seriously expect to not be insulted when you make absolutely stupid grand statements like the final one in your post? Just zero self awareness

[-] [email protected] -1 points 6 hours ago

You mean absolutely stupid grand statements like the one that says there is ABSOLUTELY no feasible path.

Sounds pretty absolute and grand, not to mention disconnected with reality.

this post was submitted on 08 Jun 2025
273 points (93.6% liked)

Fuck AI

3034 readers
1067 users here now

"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"

A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS