▲ 372 ▼ Google Restricts Android Sideloading—What It Means for User Autonomy and the Future of Mobile Freedom – Purism (puri.sm) submitted 1 year ago by excel24@feddit.org to c/technology@lemmy.world 91 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[+] throwawayacc0430@sh.itjust.works 26 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (11 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 11 child comments replies: [–] shortwavesurfer@lemmy.zip 18 points 1 year ago (6 children) I'm sorry, but in that case, it wasn't worth running the app to begin with. You can either find a third-party app that lets you access the same content, such as Newpipe and YouTube, or you can use it from a web browser, such as your bank, and if you can't do either of those, then just don't fucking use that service. I was willing to totally switch banks because my previous bank required me to use a mobile app and I did not want to do so. If I must go through some annoyance to use something that works properly, I will. For me at least, running as much open source as I can possibly do is worth more than the inconvenience caused by not being able to use these shit services. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [+] cmt@lemmy.today 22 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] clang@lemmy.zip 16 points 1 year ago (1 child) I’d be telling them to provide a work phone. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [+] cmt@lemmy.today 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent [–] 01189998819991197253@infosec.pub 1 point 1 year ago I was "required" to use duo. Okta worked fine. Might be the same in your situation, might be worth a looksee. permalink fedilink source parent [–] shortwavesurfer@lemmy.zip 1 point 1 year ago* If your work requires you to use specific software, make them purchase you a device to run that software on and leave it at work. Edit: nvm, i see that was brought up already permalink fedilink source parent [–] njordomir@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago I agree. Not having access on my terms is absolutely a deal breaker for me and could cause me to stop doing business with a company. permalink fedilink source parent [–] GreenKnight23@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago (3 children) cool, any dev who requires that is acting in bad faith against my privacy and doesn't deserve my support. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] Zagorath@aussie.zone 14 points 1 year ago (2 children) The problem comes when it's not an app you're using for the app's sake, but because it's the app of some company you have a real-world relationship with. Your bank's app being the most important one that comes to my mind, considering I've already heard about some banks trying to restrict users to only Google's flavour of Android before this. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] phx@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 year ago Honestly other than a fingerprint lock, I've found the apps suck compared to just a browser on a PC anyhow. Half the apps could just be webpages, and a bunch of those are just wrappers to a web rendering layer anyhow permalink fedilink source parent [–] GreenKnight23@lemmy.world -3 points 1 year ago and that's important why? pick a different bank, or don't use the app at all. I get that some folks think using the app is a requirement. that may be true for some but not all. don't support shitty services and these companies won't continue to abuse us. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] shortwavesurfer@lemmy.zip 18 points 1 year ago (6 children) I'm sorry, but in that case, it wasn't worth running the app to begin with. You can either find a third-party app that lets you access the same content, such as Newpipe and YouTube, or you can use it from a web browser, such as your bank, and if you can't do either of those, then just don't fucking use that service. I was willing to totally switch banks because my previous bank required me to use a mobile app and I did not want to do so. If I must go through some annoyance to use something that works properly, I will. For me at least, running as much open source as I can possibly do is worth more than the inconvenience caused by not being able to use these shit services. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [+] cmt@lemmy.today 22 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] clang@lemmy.zip 16 points 1 year ago (1 child) I’d be telling them to provide a work phone. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [+] cmt@lemmy.today 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent [–] 01189998819991197253@infosec.pub 1 point 1 year ago I was "required" to use duo. Okta worked fine. Might be the same in your situation, might be worth a looksee. permalink fedilink source parent [–] shortwavesurfer@lemmy.zip 1 point 1 year ago* If your work requires you to use specific software, make them purchase you a device to run that software on and leave it at work. Edit: nvm, i see that was brought up already permalink fedilink source parent [–] njordomir@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago I agree. Not having access on my terms is absolutely a deal breaker for me and could cause me to stop doing business with a company. permalink fedilink source parent
[+] cmt@lemmy.today 22 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] clang@lemmy.zip 16 points 1 year ago (1 child) I’d be telling them to provide a work phone. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [+] cmt@lemmy.today 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent [–] 01189998819991197253@infosec.pub 1 point 1 year ago I was "required" to use duo. Okta worked fine. Might be the same in your situation, might be worth a looksee. permalink fedilink source parent [–] shortwavesurfer@lemmy.zip 1 point 1 year ago* If your work requires you to use specific software, make them purchase you a device to run that software on and leave it at work. Edit: nvm, i see that was brought up already permalink fedilink source parent
[–] clang@lemmy.zip 16 points 1 year ago (1 child) I’d be telling them to provide a work phone. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [+] cmt@lemmy.today 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent
[+] cmt@lemmy.today 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent
[–] 01189998819991197253@infosec.pub 1 point 1 year ago I was "required" to use duo. Okta worked fine. Might be the same in your situation, might be worth a looksee. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] shortwavesurfer@lemmy.zip 1 point 1 year ago* If your work requires you to use specific software, make them purchase you a device to run that software on and leave it at work. Edit: nvm, i see that was brought up already permalink fedilink source parent
[–] njordomir@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago I agree. Not having access on my terms is absolutely a deal breaker for me and could cause me to stop doing business with a company. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] GreenKnight23@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago (3 children) cool, any dev who requires that is acting in bad faith against my privacy and doesn't deserve my support. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] Zagorath@aussie.zone 14 points 1 year ago (2 children) The problem comes when it's not an app you're using for the app's sake, but because it's the app of some company you have a real-world relationship with. Your bank's app being the most important one that comes to my mind, considering I've already heard about some banks trying to restrict users to only Google's flavour of Android before this. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] phx@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 year ago Honestly other than a fingerprint lock, I've found the apps suck compared to just a browser on a PC anyhow. Half the apps could just be webpages, and a bunch of those are just wrappers to a web rendering layer anyhow permalink fedilink source parent [–] GreenKnight23@lemmy.world -3 points 1 year ago and that's important why? pick a different bank, or don't use the app at all. I get that some folks think using the app is a requirement. that may be true for some but not all. don't support shitty services and these companies won't continue to abuse us. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Zagorath@aussie.zone 14 points 1 year ago (2 children) The problem comes when it's not an app you're using for the app's sake, but because it's the app of some company you have a real-world relationship with. Your bank's app being the most important one that comes to my mind, considering I've already heard about some banks trying to restrict users to only Google's flavour of Android before this. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] phx@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 year ago Honestly other than a fingerprint lock, I've found the apps suck compared to just a browser on a PC anyhow. Half the apps could just be webpages, and a bunch of those are just wrappers to a web rendering layer anyhow permalink fedilink source parent [–] GreenKnight23@lemmy.world -3 points 1 year ago and that's important why? pick a different bank, or don't use the app at all. I get that some folks think using the app is a requirement. that may be true for some but not all. don't support shitty services and these companies won't continue to abuse us. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] phx@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 year ago Honestly other than a fingerprint lock, I've found the apps suck compared to just a browser on a PC anyhow. Half the apps could just be webpages, and a bunch of those are just wrappers to a web rendering layer anyhow permalink fedilink source parent
[–] GreenKnight23@lemmy.world -3 points 1 year ago and that's important why? pick a different bank, or don't use the app at all. I get that some folks think using the app is a requirement. that may be true for some but not all. don't support shitty services and these companies won't continue to abuse us. permalink fedilink source parent