372
Google Restricts Android Sideloading—What It Means for User Autonomy and the Future of Mobile Freedom – Purism (puri.sm)
submitted 1 year ago by to c/technology@lemmy.world
91 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 7 points 1 year ago (3 children)

cool, any dev who requires that is acting in bad faith against my privacy and doesn't deserve my support.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
    •
  • [–] 14 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    The problem comes when it's not an app you're using for the app's sake, but because it's the app of some company you have a real-world relationship with. Your bank's app being the most important one that comes to my mind, considering I've already heard about some banks trying to restrict users to only Google's flavour of Android before this.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago

    Honestly other than a fingerprint lock, I've found the apps suck compared to just a browser on a PC anyhow. Half the apps could just be webpages, and a bunch of those are just wrappers to a web rendering layer anyhow

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • [–] -3 points 1 year ago

    and that's important why? pick a different bank, or don't use the app at all.

    I get that some folks think using the app is a requirement. that may be true for some but not all.

    don't support shitty services and these companies won't continue to abuse us.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent