63
submitted 2 weeks ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Honestly surprising to see the ratio here. (11⬆️ to 7⬇️ at time of posting.) Downvoters, I'm curious about your rationale: why do you think this is a bad idea?

[-] [email protected] 8 points 2 weeks ago

The only time the government is willing to spend money on space exploration ( or anything for that matter) is if they are trying to play a game of "Im better then you" with other nations.

We have a public space agency in the US and they have done jack all in maned space exploration since the end of the Apollo program. And what little they have done has been massively overpriced.

In my opinion , it's best to have both public and commercial space flight programs. Greed in two different directions might actually accomplish something and I strongly believe that we need a STRONG space presence not just in our own solar system but in many systems throughout the galaxy for our own survival as a species.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Interesting. Thank you for sharing your perspective. I appreciate it.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 2 weeks ago

And what little they have done has been massively overpriced.

NASA budget is nonexistent and everytime they start working on something meaningful they are forced to cancel the project due to funding cuts. It was at 4.41% of the federal spending during the peak of Apollo mission, it's 0.3% today.

SpaceX on the other hand enjoys those government handouts for doing nothing and reusing public tech, research and even personel (after Musk himself was able to fire those people) from NASA.

P.S. NASA missions might cost more, but they also don't explode as a way to "test shit". Public reaction to that would be a lot different, no?

[-] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

The only time the government is willing to spend money on space exploration ( or anything for that matter) is if they are trying to play a game of “Im better then you” with other nations.

Mostly true but perhaps a more important motivation is threatening the entire planet with doomsday.

we need a STRONG space presence not just in our own solar system but in many systems throughout the galaxy for our own survival as a species.

The MIC will love this endless fantasy. Inter-galactic imperialism! $$$!

The moon is not enough...

[-] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Downvotes aren't for disagreeing with the article lol

My guess is corporations or conservatives don't like Jacobin?

[-] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

It would be far better to dismantle these dumb grifts than to nationalize them.

this post was submitted on 07 Jun 2025
63 points (79.4% liked)

Technology

3194 readers
261 users here now

Which posts fit here?

Anything that is at least tangentially connected to the technology, social media platforms, informational technologies and tech policy.


Post guidelines

[Opinion] prefixOpinion (op-ed) articles must use [Opinion] prefix before the title.


Rules

1. English onlyTitle and associated content has to be in English.
2. Use original linkPost URL should be the original link to the article (even if paywalled) and archived copies left in the body. It allows avoiding duplicate posts when cross-posting.
3. Respectful communicationAll communication has to be respectful of differing opinions, viewpoints, and experiences.
4. InclusivityEveryone is welcome here regardless of age, body size, visible or invisible disability, ethnicity, sex characteristics, gender identity and expression, education, socio-economic status, nationality, personal appearance, race, caste, color, religion, or sexual identity and orientation.
5. Ad hominem attacksAny kind of personal attacks are expressly forbidden. If you can't argue your position without attacking a person's character, you already lost the argument.
6. Off-topic tangentsStay on topic. Keep it relevant.
7. Instance rules may applyIf something is not covered by community rules, but are against lemmy.zip instance rules, they will be enforced.


Companion communities

[email protected]
[email protected]


Icon attribution | Banner attribution


If someone is interested in moderating this community, message @[email protected].

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS