65
submitted 1 week ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

Been seeing more and more evidence that mass literacy is both massively diminished compared to the 20th century and accelerating in its decline across the world, especially in relatively highly educated countries. This problem is obviously much more severe amongst the working class than others, as historically tends to be the case.

If we want the masses to get to grips with a communist understanding of the world, which requires a lot of reading and discussion of text, surely this is an issue we need to grapple with. Current political education initiatives usually bring together smaller, highly-literate (typically university educated) groups of people, which tend to remain insular and rarely seem to engage with the broader working class. I am convinced that a significant barrier to mass political education is that so many "literate" people are unable to read a simple paragraph.

How do we rectify this situation? It seems historically unique because in the past, illiterate people had no illusions about the fact that they couldn't read and were enthusiastic about learning (at least, in general). Nowadays, I can imagine that most people would not view their literacy as something that needs to be improved, and many will even react with hostility to such a suggestion.

What's the correct approach? Do we need to emphasise the practical rewards that those who engage with theoretical texts benefit from? Take a direct approach and offer reading comprehension sessions? Interested to hear what others think.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago

Teach by doing.

This is one reason why I want to build urban communes: because the comparison effect/"keeping up with the Joneses" kicks in, and this is particularly strong in America. If you see people having a far superior quality of life on lower income/less expenditure, you're going to envy them and have an inclination to imitate them.

With 30 people you would probably have enough to buy up most of the houses on a city block, collectivize them, turn the backyards into one big yard, have 3 cars for every 10 people instead of 9, have massive time and money savings on food prep, discover untold flexibility and capacity for child care, and make better use of everything you own.

When you accomplish this, you are still not bending the capitalists to your will. And the process of doing this might invite the jealous and normative/conformist wrath of people in the settler mindset or even of sticklers. Depending on how flagrantly you break ordinances, it might cause a fight with the city. But some conflicts are useful for accumulating your energy and will to fight. It's even possible that the collective mode might be more thoroughly outlawed than it already is. But doing it will be a huge aid to the working class. If you build it, they will notice... and the bases of material support that revolutionary forces rely on aren't just going to appear out of nowhere.

[-] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago

I too long for the urban communes

[-] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago

My people will bump/set, so that your people can spike. left-unity-3

this post was submitted on 29 May 2025
65 points (100.0% liked)

askchapo

23020 readers
156 users here now

Ask Hexbear is the place to ask and answer ~~thought-provoking~~ questions.

Rules:

  1. Posts must ask a question.

  2. If the question asked is serious, answer seriously.

  3. Questions where you want to learn more about socialism are allowed, but questions in bad faith are not.

  4. Try [email protected] if you're having questions about regarding moderation, site policy, the site itself, development, volunteering or the mod team.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS