136
submitted 1 week ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] [email protected] 27 points 1 week ago

Because none of the downsides listed in this article really matter for most projects. The fact that GitHub is owned by Microsoft doesn't magically give them rights over the code that they wouldn't have if it was hosted somewhere else.

[-] [email protected] 6 points 6 days ago

Unless they share it against the license terms via copilot of course.

Otherwise, I agree with you.

[-] [email protected] 15 points 6 days ago

What stops them from doing that with code hosted somewhere else as long as it's publicly accessible?

[-] [email protected] 1 points 3 days ago

I guess that is up to those other places

[-] [email protected] 5 points 6 days ago

If anything, it being on Github makes it impossible for them to claim ignorance about the license. If they scrape your code off your site, they'd have to actively add checks to look for the license.

They'd rather just use the "it's probably as fine as every other piece of HTML" assumption they're working with now.

this post was submitted on 27 May 2025
136 points (96.6% liked)

Opensource

2794 readers
53 users here now

A community for discussion about open source software! Ask questions, share knowledge, share news, or post interesting stuff related to it!

CreditsIcon base by Lorc under CC BY 3.0 with modifications to add a gradient



founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS