541
hurts less than getting eaten by a coyote
(lemmy.ml)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 21 May 2025
541 points (85.2% liked)
memes
20574 readers
788 users here now
Community rules
1. Be civil
No trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour
2. No politics
This is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world
3. No recent reposts
Check for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month
4. No bots
No bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins
5. No Spam/Ads/AI Slop
No advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live. We also consider AI slop to be spam in this community and is subject to removal.
A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment
Sister communities
- !tenforward@lemmy.world : Star Trek memes, chat and shitposts
- !lemmyshitpost@lemmy.world : Lemmy Shitposts, anything and everything goes.
- !linuxmemes@lemmy.world : Linux themed memes
- !comicstrips@lemmy.world : for those who love comic stories.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Humans can sustain a large density of cats that wasn't possible in the wild. If it's a pet cat, don't let it hunt. It will imbalance the ecosystem by adding too many predators who don't depend on the prey for sustenance
I always love bringing out this good ol chart.
Fake news. Birds aren't real.
so... cats are the most effective way to combat birds?
yes :)
Bro someone send this chart to Australia, they can win EW2
I might bookmark this one :)
But I am not talking about the US
Not a lick of urban sprawl in your fancy graphic. I wonder why?
Buildings, automobiles, power lines......
Which is not the same as the effects of urban sprawl destroying their habitat (however this is obviously impossible to quantify)
English isn't your first language.
Thinking isn't your strong suit.
Define urban sprawl.
How would you quantify that?
Are you under the impression that being against urban sprawl is an unpopular opinion on Lemmy?
Im under the impression that saying that cats are the end of birds is asinine when all we do as humans is destroy habitat for all fauna.
Overly dramatic people who think their meat comes from a store are the same people who make this argument about cats.
Get over it, cats are not the genocidal maniacs you make them out to be, WE ARE.
Maybe letting cats out is one of the many ways we destroy habitat, and calling it out is valid?
Maybe start with the house that is burning down before putting out your match.
And stop calling out those who call you out on this crap.
You're not calling anyone out on anything. We're all quite aware of habitat destruction. It's just not the focus of this particular thread.
Ok, sure, Im not calling you out. I'm calling you deluded.
By your chosen username I'd guess you are a teenager with a cat. No one is coming for your particular cat, we are trying to save birds by talking about the norm of cat owning and how that should probably change over time.
And by your comment, I assume you are delusional by accusing cats of committing genocide when we humans displace and destroy the very places birds live and feed in.
Address the real issue if you love birds so much.
It's not about loving birds for you people it's about hating cats. That is very clear to me.
Please explain how cities like Rome and Istanbul still have birds if cats are so genocidal towards them?
Their bird populations are nowhere near even endangered status and are probably thriving.
So where are the genocidal cats?
I'm really not surprised by your assumption of my username being so wrong because I expect delusional people to create an alternate reality in their minds.
Have a great life!
I like cats very much and cats like me. But existing within an ecosystem or society means you have to create rules that solve for larger outcomes than the scope of you and your cat. Bird play an extremely valuable role in the ecosystem. Cats frankly, a bit less so, even though they are great pets.
I think the best approach here is to step out of your own day to day and think about the best balance to be acheived with this particular issue between humans and the environment they live in. Pretend you are the emperor of the world and you need to make the wiseset decision you can that maintains a sustainable balance. Would your choice be unhindered cat population expansion?