this post was submitted on 17 May 2025
763 points (98.8% liked)

memes

14835 readers
4649 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to [email protected]

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/AdsNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live.

A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment

Sister communities

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 44 points 3 days ago (4 children)

Assigning a value of 5 to pi, although ludicrous IRL, doesn't affect the problem. Plug the values into the equation and it will still give an answer that's correct in context.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 2 days ago (2 children)

For the benefit of doubt, maybe the test is from an alternate dimension that doesn't use euclidean space.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I've been there, I think, but it was really difficult to triangulate my location and confirm

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 days ago

That's because you were supposed to rhombusulate, not triangulate.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago

Possible. I mean, electricity could actually be run by ghosts, but there's no need for fanciful explanations when a mundane one is right there.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 3 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

I wish they would have used 22/7 for pi and 7 for the radius or height

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 days ago (1 children)

If the goal is to avoid calculations with decimal places, why not just leave Pi in the result?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago

That would work too.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Do cylinders even exist in metrics where pi = 5 ?

[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Yes. The 3d shape existence is not affected by changing pi values

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Cause it's just a (n-1)-dimensional ball extruded along the remaining axis, or do all 3d shapes exist on (nearly) all 3d metrics?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago

Mostly because the actual pi values can vary in between non/euclidean geometries. Within extremely strong gravitational fields, spacetime becomes highly non euclidean, affecting the C/d ratio of an actual circle, so I'd wager this would affect pi as well

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Technically no, because pi equals pi not 5. But you can approximate its value as 3 or 5 or whatever you want, knowing it's not exact and that your result will only be an approximation. I mean you could also ask how long light takes to reach us from Alpha Centauri if the speed of light is 1000 mph. It's not, but if you make that a condition of the problem you can do the calculation just fine.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago

I think that reason would make it "Technically Yes", since False (pi = 5) implies False (cylinders exist) is (vacuously) True ("absurd premise").