this post was submitted on 16 May 2025
488 points (99.2% liked)
Games
38610 readers
1375 users here now
Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.
Weekly Threads:
Rules:
-
Submissions have to be related to games
-
No bigotry or harassment, be civil
-
No excessive self-promotion
-
Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts
-
Mark Spoilers and NSFW
-
No linking to piracy
More information about the community rules can be found here and here.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
This is incompetence.
I've been in and out of games for my entire career. Every place I've been has had strict policies on outside art assets. I've even seen every new art asset to require a monthly license review to prevent any chance of outside art having slipped in somehow, including any usage of Blender's example model Suzanne.
This certainly sounds the right way to do this.
But I really wonder about the stuff at bungie being "just" incompetence, because their defence is "weren't aware of this, just used assets left by a former Bungie employee that's not here anymore"... And yet the art director had been following the plagiarized artist on twitter this whole time.
And they have an history of "just taking" when they think they can get away with it, as they've done with fanart. So, shitty studio culture sounds a definite possibility at that point.