this post was submitted on 13 May 2025
536 points (97.5% liked)
United States | News & Politics
2856 readers
1863 users here now
Welcome to [email protected], where you can share and converse about the different things happening all over/about the United States.
If you’re interested in participating, please subscribe.
Rules
Be respectful and civil. No racism/bigotry/hateful speech.
Post anything related to the United States.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Sounds fair to me. If he wanted people to support him unconditionally then he wouldn't be running spoiler candidates against his own party.
I understand a lot of people don't think the DNC is good enough. But they don't seem to know how good the DNC is in general or even how much better it is than the alternative.
What's the alternative? Because the DNC has been doing some real shitty things the past decade.
In the past decade we haven't once given the DNC more than 50 seats. If we had given them 60 we would have public option expanded healthcare, we would be taxing the rich, citizens united wouldn't still exist and all this talk of megarich donors would go away, and men and women would have full body autonomy and reproductive organ control as enshrined rights.
Instead, the alternative is getting fucked by Republicans at every turn and complaining that none of the DNC platform has been achievable even though we gave them 44 fucking seats and a Bernie Sanders.
The alternative would be to drop the DLC and parties altogether, which is what should happen.
Partisan politics should not be allowed in the first place
Anything that keeps the conservative corporate pro-genocide gerontocracy running the party "sounds fair" to you.