105
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 14 May 2025
105 points (100.0% liked)
chat
8425 readers
207 users here now
Chat is a text only community for casual conversation, please keep shitposting to the absolute minimum. This is intended to be a separate space from c/chapotraphouse or the daily megathread. Chat does this by being a long-form community where topics will remain from day to day unlike the megathread, and it is distinct from c/chapotraphouse in that we ask you to engage in this community in a genuine way. Please keep shitposting, bits, and irony to a minimum.
As with all communities posts need to abide by the code of conduct, additionally moderators will remove any posts or comments deemed to be inappropriate.
Thank you and happy chatting!
founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
yeah
completely reasonable and justifiable to point this out and while maybe you cant definitively say porn causes these things the propagation and normalization of these trends I do think is harmful and reinforcing, particularly in cultural narratives and attitudes around sex and SV. Why is that even a debate, this is a Citations Needed/Michael Parenti fan webzonesame and also why let the evangelicals be the only voice in the room on problematic porn use which is very obviously a thing (even if you disagree with the label of addiction)? And I think that extends beyond the content of porn itself, and requires a very explicit marxist and materialist lens to be analyzed properly, since imo it applies more broadly to modern content delivery and our relationship to the internet in general today.
I think part of this too is some of the language and narratives (ESPECIALLY pop-psych ones) around addiction and also how we communicate regarding it but thats a different conversation maybe