this post was submitted on 13 May 2025
745 points (96.6% liked)
196
5158 readers
1600 users here now
Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.
Rule: You must post before you leave.
Other rules
Behavior rules:
- No bigotry (transphobia, racism, etc…)
- No genocide denial
- No support for authoritarian behaviour (incl. Tankies)
- No namecalling
- Accounts from lemmygrad.ml, threads.net, or hexbear.net are held to higher standards
- Other things seen as cleary bad
Posting rules:
- No AI generated content (DALL-E etc…)
- No advertisements
- No gore / violence
- Mutual aid posts are not allowed
NSFW: NSFW content is permitted but it must be tagged and have content warnings. Anything that doesn't adhere to this will be removed. Content warnings should be added like: [penis], [explicit description of sex]. Non-sexualized breasts of any gender are not considered inappropriate and therefore do not need to be blurred/tagged.
Also, when sharing art (comics etc.) please credit the creators.
If you have any questions, feel free to contact us on our matrix channel or email.
Other 196's:
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
The difference is smaller than you might think
Effect of gender affirming hormones on athletic performance in transwomen and transmen: implications for sporting organisations and legislators
That's a massive difference in even amateur sports let alone elite level. That contradicts your point rather than support it.
What? We can use science and data to look at the impacts empirically instead of throwing baseless speculations around???
Who knew?
Yes, that's why I said that many sports have introduced a hormone therapy "minimum", so to speak. Which is fine I guess, depending on the sport. This has to be individually tested.
But allowing trans women into sport without any extensive hormone therapy is straightup unfair.