Main, home of the dope ass bear.
THE MAIN RULE: ALL TEXT POSTS MUST CONTAIN "MAIN" OR BE ENTIRELY IMAGES (INLINE OR EMOJI)
(Temporary moratorium on main rule to encourage more posting on main. We reserve the right to arbitrarily enforce it whenever we wish and the right to strike this line and enforce mainposting with zero notification to the users because its funny)
A hexbear.net commainity. Main sure to subscribe to other communities as well. Your feed will become the Lion's Main!
Good comrades mainly sort posts by hot and comments by new!
State-by-state guide on maintaining firearm ownership
Domain guide on mutual aid and foodbank resources
Tips for looking at financials of non-profits (How to donate amainly)
Community-sourced megapost on the main media sources to radicalize libs and chuds with
Main Source for Feminism for Babies
Maintaining OpSec / Data Spring Cleaning guide
Remain up to date on what time is it in Moscow
view the rest of the comments
Well of course, being a real researcher is a lot harder then asking ChatGPT so if you make it optional they're not gonna do it.
The Bibliography is worth points. It's actually designed specifically to encourage research -- it's graded based on # of sources with a specific goal (that I explain) that it should document their reading and include everything they use to find sources as well (the idea pedagogically is that it's actually giving them credit when they read something they decide not to use).
Right but what I'm saying is make them show their work to a higher standard than typical publishing bibliography requirements. That's entirely fair given the state of play vis-a-vis LLMs. Make it easier on you to fail them, it's more work for them to fake a research corpus with real and fake sources in Zotero. It's easier for you to detect a completely falsified document this way.
Yeah there's other stuff for that, but it doesn't help that they're not persuaded showing their work is valuable (despite my insistence at the beginning of the quarter all the stuff is there to help them).
Can't get too into deets because I could potentially doxx myself (don't expect me to share prompts, etc). Needless to say, I feel like my annotated bibliography has a fairly strong standard for proving material is extant. It's the students that neglect to do so that end up getting got....
I manage software production and I have similar problems regarding programmers and code quality. My red line is, I'll explain the whys and hows but at the end of the day I don't give a shit what you think because you don't have to be responsible for the software and I do -- so we're gonna make it easier on me. You can lead a horse to water and all....