this post was submitted on 25 Apr 2025
143 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

38579 readers
315 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Ask just about anybody, and they'll tell you that new cars are too expensive. In the wake of tariffs shaking the auto industry and with the Trump administration pledging to kill the federal EV incentive, that situation isn't looking to get better soon, especially for anyone wanting something battery-powered. Changing that overly spendy status quo is going to take something radical, and it's hard to get more radical than what Slate Auto has planned.

Meet the Slate Truck, a sub-$20,000 (after federal incentives) electric vehicle that enters production next year. It only seats two yet has a bed big enough to hold a sheet of plywood. It only does 150 miles on a charge, only comes in gray, and the only way to listen to music while driving is if you bring along your phone and a Bluetooth speaker. It is the bare minimum of what a modern car can be, and yet it's taken three years of development to get to this point.

But this is more than bargain-basement motoring. Slate is presenting its truck as minimalist design with DIY purpose, an attempt to not just go cheap but to create a new category of vehicle with a huge focus on personalization. That design also enables a low-cost approach to manufacturing that has caught the eye of major investors, reportedly including Jeff Bezos. It's been engineered and will be manufactured in America, but is this extreme simplification too much for American consumers?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Would definitely buy one of these. I miss having a truck, but I only need one occasionally for the occasional need to haul something that won't fit in my car (e.g. Lowe's trips). I also really dislike the "smartphone on wheels" aspect of pretty much all current EVs.

Plus, I hate the infotainment systems so I would be happy to roll my own.

Though I do wonder if it has a backup camera/screen. Aren't those required nowadays?

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Touchscreens are the worst interface in a vehicle. But yes, Amercian law says all automobiles must have a backup camera installed as of 2018. I need and use a truck but I do just fine with a smaller Tacoma, which these days are basically a full size truck of yester-yore. These look nice, like the UTE style; but the 150 mile range would be an issue for me.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 day ago

That's what I thought (re: backup cameras), and someone else mentioned the gauge cluster is a digital screen which switches to the backup camera view). In my case, 150 miles (round trip ) would be just around the upper edge of my use cases, though 15-20 would be more average.

which these days are basically a full size truck of yester-yore

Makes me miss my old 2003 Ranger. It was right where I needed a truck to be, size-wise.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago

I think there is an option to upgrade the battery to have a 240mi range

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

According to the articles I read about it, the gauges are a digital screen which changes to the backup camara when in reverse.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Good to know. Will have to read up, though from the little I've read, it sounds like this is just a concept for now.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago

Seems like they have physical concept cars they've built based off the Arstechnica article.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago

the website for it is pretty comprehensive as far as i can tell