this post was submitted on 22 Apr 2025
394 points (96.5% liked)
Fuck AI
2518 readers
797 users here now
"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"
A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I've had both DDG(Bing) and Google give me "no results found" for a query I know with 100% certainty worked a few years ago.
Started with a few words in a row in quotation marks, and it just goes nope. Then you add a bunch of related keywords and suddenly it can find it just fine. And will even highlight the phrase you had in quotation marks, the one it claimed had zero results. Because it no longer uses your words to actually search through web page contents, it puts your query into an LLM and uses that to filter and lookup things.
This is my exact assumption. It use to be very useful to use quotes for finding very specific things like file names. Now it's just garbage and returns no results when the LLM spits out garbage.
I just can't understand why it doesn't fallback to old behavior.
Seems like they actually have lost their old infrastructure by implementing LLM stuff. They literally went backwards in terms of search.
Oh, hell no. Does anyone have a list of which search engines do that? Or alternatively, a list of search engines that explicitly don't?
Because I don't even know where to search to find this kind of information anymore.