you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[+] 10 points 2 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (9 children)
  • [+] -7 points 2 years ago* (8 children)

    They can’t do that here, you have generally some rights before convicted

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 2 years ago* (5 children)

    Yes and they used to have that in the U.S. as well, but surprise surprise! If you put an authoritarian in power, who delights in being cruel and punishing people, you tend to lose some of those precious rights.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [+] -7 points 2 years ago* (4 children)

    Then maybe you shouldn’t vote on such candidate. It’s hard to protect every single law from being twisted when you elect some kind of

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Well, I didn't vote for anyone in the U.S. since I don't live there.

    But my point is, non-authoritarians wouldn't even suggest sending their own citizens to foreign prisons/camps. It's cruel and unnecessary and it doesn't solve the root of any issues. It's just offloading your problems onto someone else.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [+] 5 points 2 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child)
  • [–] -5 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

    As I said not really. What I am talking about is semi related

    It’s a general trend lately around the world to send immigrant prisoners away but I argue about making it nationality agnostic

    Why should we only send away immigrant offenders when we can send all offenders somewhere?

    This way we can avoid racism accusations

  • source
  • parent