this post was submitted on 06 Apr 2025
861 points (99.3% liked)

World News

45858 readers
3073 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 98 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

That’s not a problem I’ll just go ask one of my historical trade partnohnoholyfuckwhatdidijustdo.

[–] [email protected] 30 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Never fight a trade war ~~on two fronts~~ against every country simultaneously.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 week ago

he is repeating history, starting trade wars to trigger world war.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago

In the wise words of Londo Mollari

Only an idiot fights a war on two fronts. Only the heir to the throne of the kingdom of idiots would fight a war on twelve fronts.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

The MIC already worked a solution since last time China restricted exports; both Cali and Australia would pick up production.

The problem with rare earth isn't that it's rare, it's that they only exist in low concentrations, and the total lack of labor and environmental laws in China means that there is no room for external competitors to compete on price... Our modern neoliberal governments refuse to do anything that does not enrich or empower the oligarchy; not even for "national security".

Unfortunately, this means Australia might have just jumped to the top of the nazi parties annexation list.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

The "cheap Chinese labor and lax laws" thing is not exactly the issue, at least not these days. The thing is that Chinese industry has spent decades working out how to refine these minerals, and they're the only ones who are now able to do it at scale. So other countries that extract and process rare earths (which as noted aren't actually that rare) often ship semi-processed ore to China for final processing.

Sure, other countries can replicate these capabilities if they're willing to put in the effort. It's like China's challenge with EUV lithography, but in reverse. It will take significant time. Also, building up a rare earths processing industry probably involves not just spending capital, but also major environmental risks while you're doing your trials.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago

Yup, it is processing of the ores that china is good at. Rare earth is not that rare.