this post was submitted on 06 Apr 2025
487 points (99.0% liked)

/r/50501 Mirror

860 readers
1072 users here now


Mirrored /r/50501 Popular Posts


founded 1 month ago
MODERATORS
 

πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡ΈπŸ’ͺβ€οΈπŸ€πŸ’™


Originally Posted By u/VociferousVal At 2025-04-06 06:25:02 AM | Source


you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 28 points 2 weeks ago (5 children)

I'm really disappointed that none of the articles I've seen have included any estimates for how many people turned out and where.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 2 weeks ago

The massive systemic censorship continues!

[–] [email protected] 16 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Article in Utah claims only 6k attendees. Look at that picture and tell me if you think that's true.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (2 children)

Honestly, yea. 100% coverage is being fucked with to make things seem worse than they are but I doubt there are even 3,000 people in that photo. May well have been over 6,000 people there and I sure hope there was but the photo is not a gotcha.

Grab group of ten people, further away so they’re more dense, then count out ten of those are you mentally paste it around the photo. That will be 100 people. Then take that and do the same thing ten more times and you’ll get 1,000.

Everywhere else for sure was crushing it, and honestly I feel like even 6,000 is a pretty great turnout for Utah, no?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I get the theory of the counting, I guess I'm biasing because I understand the shape of that field. The picture is probably 5/8 the field that was packed.

Along with the elevation. It's really hard to picture except from direct above, as the field drops out significantly. I couldn't even see the speaker from my vantage.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 weeks ago

Yea knowing just how big that field is, and it sounds like you were also there, really helps a a lot.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 weeks ago

I saw some articles claiming a few hundred in my area, which isn't one of the largest but still a major city, so yeah, 6k is great

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 weeks ago

Yeah, this would be good to know for a number of reasons.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Even if it did, how did they count everyone? Are there some drone software capable of counting people in an area or in a picture?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 weeks ago

You can make estimates based on crowd density and area. There are online tools for it.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago

National park service provided the numbers?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 weeks ago

Fake news is there to ensure that we don't get real news lol