this post was submitted on 09 Mar 2025
987 points (98.7% liked)

solarpunk memes

3380 readers
1983 users here now

For when you need a laugh!

The definition of a "meme" here is intentionally pretty loose. Images, screenshots, and the like are welcome!

But, keep it lighthearted and/or within our server's ideals.

Posts and comments that are hateful, trolling, inciting, and/or overly negative will be removed at the moderators' discretion.

Please follow all slrpnk.net rules and community guidelines

Have fun!

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 13 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 1 minute ago) (1 children)

I hate whhen people attribute map problems to the Mercator projection without properly learning about what is actually wrong with it.

  1. This is not a Mercator projection map. The northern side of the US is straight and horizontal on Mercartor maps.
  2. "Straight lines" on a globe (great circles) on the Northern hemisphere bend in this ⏜ way, not this ⏝ on a Mercartor map.
  3. Flattening a sphere without compromises is impossible. Most other projections are either unusable in many local contexts or don't span the globe. Mercator (specifically the WGS-84 implementation) works very well unless your journey goes over ±84° latitude, which is OK for most cases. Every other projection will stretch, skew or cut local areas in major ways and EVERY ONE WILL SHOW (almost every instance of) THE SHORTEST (great circle) PATH AS NOT STRAIGHT. And the last, all-caps point only manifests for long journeys. If you can travel long distances in a straight line, you are piloting a ship or aircraft, and you can afford a computer to plot the great circle curve.

Actual problems with Mercator:

  1. It needs to be infinitely tall to cover poles. This map shows how tall a version that gets to .1 mm from the South Pole is. Therefore, polar researchers and the military need to get another app for navigation (along with hardware for whatever the substitute for GPS is). Like every map projection, it distorts "long" straight lines (look at the Amundsen-Scott station building) but what's important, angles and bearings are preserved (the building still has 4 right angles).
  2. It significantly distorts sizes at different latitudes so it's not recommended for showing the entire world, especially for a child's first impression. There are worse picks, such as Gall-Peters (which preserves sizes but stretches shapes horribly unless you are close to the very conveniently picked 45° latitude where most of the Europe lives, nullifying the notion that the map combats imperiallism) or Dymaxion (which I love but cutting oceans and the equator into incongruent pieces strewn all over the page does not help children grasp basic geography).
[–] [email protected] 4 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

I'm rather impressed by your two unicode curve examples

[–] [email protected] 3 points 11 hours ago

I've scrolled through UnicodePad so many times I know what to expect where, so I usually only have to skim through one to three block.