this post was submitted on 06 Mar 2025
276 points (97.9% liked)

Canada

8435 readers
1993 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


πŸ—ΊοΈ Provinces / Territories


πŸ™οΈ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


πŸ’ SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


πŸ’» Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


πŸ’΅ Finance, Shopping, Sales


πŸ—£οΈ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Supporters of Canada’s F-35 purchase point to the hundreds of millions of dollars worth of contracts that Canadian companies have earned by supplying parts for the U.S. aircraft. That, in turn, has sustained or created Canadian aerospace jobs. But on Feb. 28, the National Post reported that Trump has told Lockheed Martin he wants those jobs back in the U.S. when the Canadian contracts come up for renewal.

During the 2015 election campaign, Justin Trudeau vowed his government would never purchase the F-35.

As prime minister, Trudeau continued to point out the Canadian military had no need for the F-35 and he blamed the Conservatives for agreeing to purchase a problem-plagued fighter jet. But, with the 2023 announcement, the Liberals not only committed to the acquisition, but also increased the number of jets to be bought to 88 from the 65 the Conservatives had wanted.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 18 points 2 days ago (3 children)

I remember before the purchase was made, I was really hoping the government would purchase the Swedish Saab Gripen. I think it was one of the finalists for consideration (that's what I remembered from a few news casts at the time, but not sure if it was an actual finalist, or just someone saying they thought it would be a good option.)

The main reason for me thinking we should have gone with the Saab, was that I trusted buying from Sweden more than the US. I can see the US putting some systems in place that could give them control or some way to negatively affect the F-35s. I remember someone saying that countries don't have friends, only interests, but I'd still trust Sweden more than the US to not betray us in some way.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

There's a problem with the engine. It's an US design and the US just blocked a sell to Colombia. I think Saab should make another design with the Typhoon engine or some other European engine that has roughly the same size and push.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The engine was originally of Volvo design

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It's a General Electric F404 license.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Yes, on the newer versions. The earlier versions still in use, have the Volvo engine installed.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Then why the US can veto it's sell to Colombia?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Because they are buying the newer version...

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 14 hours ago

The newer ones (E and F) use the GE F414G.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 days ago

The biggest issue would be stopping sharing spares. Given the current government's proclivity for using any leverage they can get their hands on.... Well.... I'd be nervous if I'd bought them.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Saab Gripen

The fighter from the 80s?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 day ago

Gripen E is newer than the F35

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

F16 (70s)? F18 (70s)? B2 (80s)? F22 (80s)?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The F22 is not from the 1980s.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

It's design is from the 80s. It was first built in the 90s. The maiden flight of the prototype was in 1990.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 day ago

Yes, but it's been updated a lot since then, I think the current iteration is the E-series.