this post was submitted on 11 Feb 2025
25 points (83.8% liked)
Ye Power Trippin' Bastards
778 readers
101 users here now
This is a community in the spirit of "Am I The Asshole" where people can post their own bans from lemmy or reddit or whatever and get some feedback from others whether the ban was justified or not.
Sometimes one just wants to be able to challenge the arguments some mod made and this could be the place for that.
Posting Guidelines
All posts should follow this basic structure:
- Which mods/admins were being Power Tripping Bastards?
- What sanction did they impose (e.g. community ban, instance ban, removed comment)?
- Provide a screenshot of the relevant modlog entry (don’t de-obfuscate mod names).
- Provide a screenshot and explanation of the cause of the sanction (e.g. the post/comment that was removed, or got you banned).
- Explain why you think its unfair and how you would like the situation to be remedied.
Rules
- Post only about bans or other sanctions that you have received from a mod or admin.
- Don’t use private communications to prove your point. We can’t verify them and they can be faked easily.
- Don’t deobfuscate mod names from the modlog with admin powers.
- Don’t harass mods or brigade comms. Don’t word your posts in a way that would trigger such harassment and brigades.
- Do not downvote posts if you think they deserved it. Use the comment votes (see below) for that.
- You can post about power trippin’ in any social media, not just lemmy. Feel free to post about reddit or a forum etc.
- If you are the accused PTB, while you are welcome to respond, please do so within the relevant post.
Expect to receive feedback about your posts, they might even be negative.
Make sure you follow this instance's code of conduct. In other words we won't allow bellyaching about being sanctioned for hate speech or bigotry.
YTPB matrix channel: For real-time discussions about bastards or to appeal mod actions in YPTB itself.
Some acronyms you might see.
- PTB - Power-Tripping Bastard: The commenter agrees with you this was a PTB mod.
- YDI - You Deserved It: The commenter thinks you deserved that mod action.
- BPR - Bait-Provoked Reaction: That mod probably overreacted in charged situation, or due to being baited.
- CLM - Clueless mod: The mod probably just doesn't understand how their software works.
Relevant comms
founded 6 months ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Observing when there's a repeated pattern of harassing one user, and taking responsive action against a request for sanctions against that user that doesn't even pretend to be justified, is in absolutely no way making them a "superior class of user."
If this user had "interacted negatively" with whoever, we wouldn't be having this conversation, because I wouldn't have noticed and probably wouldn't have cared. The user requested mod sanctions against FlyingSquid. It's hard for me to read "I'm going to report some totally harmless comment because everything FlyingSquid says is wrong" any way other than "FlyingSquid shouldn't be allowed to make comments because they pick fights." Okay, the reporting user picks fights, and now they're not allowed to make comments. Sounds like the type of social contract they were advocating for, a second ago. Right?
The paradox of tolerance is real, man. Everyone can have their opinion about whether I'm right or wrong, but I came out of this conversation concluding that I did the right thing.
Oh gosh, ew. I can't believe you spent the previous paragraph saying FS isn't special, or in a different category, and then immediately said this.
I was on your side until this, even though we can't see the DMs and one instance of behavior that you don't like is definitely more "warning" territory than banning territory. I think there's room for vibes-based moderation, especially on an instance you host, but you're openly admitting you give FS special treatment, and then in the same breath, saying that you aren't.
PTB, and also gross. If you can't see why special moderation action to protect someone from "harrassment" when you wouldn't extend that protection to someone else isn't fair, I don't know what to tell you. Rules apply evenly to everyone, no matter how much you like somebody.
You misunderstood my statement. If this user had “interacted negatively” with FlyingSquid, or anyone else, I wouldn’t have noticed or cared. The thing that made it different was that it wasn’t just a negative interaction, it was a request for sanctions, and also the pattern that the request fits into.
I have no particular opinion about FlyingSquid as a person. I don’t think I have ever had even a single interaction with them. If I have, I have forgotten.
The issue is whether there is a clear pattern. Nothing about the target of the pattern. Some people have been telling me that, if it was repeated reports, that would be one thing, and the fact that it was a single report means I overreacted. That’s fair, I guess, but my argument is that there are repeated reports of this type, and there’s no particular guarantee that any account that pops into existence and then instantly starts filing more of them isn’t part of it. I tried to give the benefit of the doubt by talking to the person, and they rejected my attempt, so by default they fall into part of that pattern. Whether or not it is justified to put them there (since it’s impossible to tell one way or another). I don’t think that on a network that’s inherently anonymous, we need to extend indefinite courtesy to every new account that “they must be new, they get extra leeway until it’s ironclad that they’re causing problems on purpose and not going to stop.”
Absolutely I would. I’m pretty sure I have made comments in this exact community along those lines (defending someone I really don’t care for, because my read of the situation is that they were 100% in the right in whatever particular scenario). I can try to dig up examples of you’re interested to see them.
Okay but in the OP here you have the opinion that FlyingSquid is someone who needs protecting.
Emphasis mine.
You're not being objective about it and you're arguing with anyone who points that out.
You don't have to be objective about this on your own instance. But you came here to ask if YTA and yes, you are.
The users saying the issue is if there is a clear pattern aren't arguing in support of whether there is a clear pattern of the world conspiring against one user. They're saying moderation action is supposed to come down on someone, someone, with a clear pattern of misbehavior. Permabans for rules or harrassment require more than one incident of being a nuisance. Otherwise, they call for a clear but stern warning.
If I'm the mod, or admin, and someone reports Stamets (I'm sorry hon I was just trying to think of someone I favor) for rule breaking when he didn't, just because a bunch of other people have been harassing assholes to him isn't enough justification to ban that one person!
Now again, vibes-based moderation is fine. It's your instance. It's your little hamlet, and you're the ruler. But as for whether this is objectively fair or not, the answer is no. And if this combative attitude is what you took to that user in DMs, then I can see why they escalated to a point where you had to ban them.
I think everyone is someone who needs protecting. My point is that things are happening to FlyingSquid that are not happening to the average person, which means I react differently when another instance of that same thing happens. It's not based on any particular special class I put FlyingSquid in, because pretty much the only thing I know about him is the pattern of people criticizing him for things that seem to me to be made up, and me looking into it and seeing at most like 20% justification for it and often 0%. Like in this case.
It sounds like you're saying that I'm an asshole, and being biased, if I do that. All I can really say is we're going to need to agree to disagree.
I addressed this exact point pretty clearly in the comment you're replying to. It's a pretty critical part of my response, because like I said, what you're saying is a pretty fair point.
I'm not super friendly all the time online. I'm actually trying to work on it. But honestly I don't feel like I need to be super-friendly to someone who's using my hosting to spew bullshit into the network. I was civil about it, maybe a little bit curt, a lot like what you see in these comments yes. If they decide it needs to escalate because of that because I didn't put any heart emojis, then IDK what to tell them other than "bold strategy Cotton" et cetera.
You asked for judgment. I gave it.
I think you came here to get a pat on the ass and have people agree with you, not to hear dissenting opinion.
100000% this. There is literally NO consideration of any of the points brought up, simply OP pontificating around everyone else's thoughts and coming to their own conclusion every time. It literally always comes back to "but it's my instance," which nobody has actually disagreed with.
Moderate your own instance however you want, but they asked for a judgement and the consensus is nearly-unanimously against them.
You seem set in your ways, so good luck. What communities do you moderate? I'm just going to block and move on if this is the policy there 🤷♂️