this post was submitted on 15 Jan 2025
355 points (96.6% liked)

Not The Onion

12727 readers
1710 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Comments must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago) (1 children)

Alright but the highly superficial act is seen as virtuous. The act we oppose when we use this phrase. That act. It is virtuous. Therefor we in this hypothetical stand against virtue and goodness.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago) (1 children)

It generally means that we don't believe they'd be taking that action if there weren't a camera rolling or trending hashtag to follow. It's not criticizing the actual action, but the context around the action.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 49 minutes ago (1 children)

Yeah cool but that doesnt argue any of my points whatsoever.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 42 minutes ago (1 children)

We're agreeing that the individual act is virtuous. You're not understanding that complaints of virtue signaling are not criticizing the individual act. They're criticizing the unspoken lack of other acts.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 36 minutes ago (1 children)

Yeah cool cool cool, its an admission to fault to use the term we agree.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 25 minutes ago