this post was submitted on 13 Jan 2025
148 points (96.2% liked)

Comic Strips

13162 readers
3284 users here now

Comic Strips is a community for those who love comic stories.

The rules are simple:

Web of links

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Geez almost wrote 2024 again. So im something like a decade older than the artist and the weird thing about my age is im constantly wondering how much of this stuff is the modern age and the way technology has sorta grown into this constant multitasking and how much is just my age.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] [email protected] 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

If you want to complain about the only standard that makes sense is ISO 8601, 2025-01-13.

[โ€“] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Actually, RFC 3339 is better. ๐Ÿ™ƒ

[โ€“] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

Isn't RFC 3339 just a slightly stricter subset of ISO 8601 (been a bit since I had to really worry about date standards).

[โ€“] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago

To be honest, I don't even know the exact differences.

I do like that RFC 3339 allows you to write it like this:
2020-12-09 16:09:53
Whereas ISO 8601 requires it to be written like this:
2020-12-09T16:09:53

But the main reason RFC 3339 is better, is this: https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc3339
Yes, that is the whole RFC. I'm not linking that to be funny.

I'm linking it, because this is the closest I can show you to ISO 8601: https://www.iso.org/standard/70907.html
A fucking paywall. I couldn't know the exact differences between the two, because I cannot read the latter.

[โ€“] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago (2 children)

is it 8601 or 8061. now im confused.

[โ€“] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago

8610 Writing the digits in descending order is the best way to write any number.

[โ€“] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago