OH YEAH THEYRE TALKING ABOUT IT NOW

Please do not remove mods, really sorry for the Google AMP link, but this is a "subscribers only" blocked article on CNN that for some reason AMP just straight up bypasses and opens fine.

Direct link: https://www.cnn.com/2025/01/10/us/jury-nullification-luigi-mangione-defense/index.html.

Edit 1: updated title, CNN changed it on me

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 12 points 2 years ago (2 children)

There are good parts and bad parts to it. Historically, it was used for good in the form of letting slaves go free. It was also historically used to let lynch mobs go free, which is horrifying.

It's not 100% good, nor is it 100% bad.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    It's just another part of democracy. "Democracy is the worst form of government, except all the others that have been tried."

    Any form of government can produce positive and negative outcomes. Even absolute monarchy had its moments. Once in a very blue moon, you would actually get a "good" king or tyrant, one that really did try to use his power and influence for the greater good. But through trial and error we learned that, on average, democratic systems produce far better outcomes than monarchical or dictatorial ones. No system of government has entirely positive outcomes; they just vary in their ratio of positive to negative.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 2 years ago

    Agreed, 100%. Democratic juries are absolutely better.

    I was mostly addressing this part:

    complaining about jury nullification just means you don’t like the good parts of having a jury.

    There are some valid cases to complain about it. But the majority of the time, it's a good thing.

  • source
  • parent