44
C-Span | Supreme Court Hears Case on TikTok Ban
(www.youtube.com)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 10 Jan 2025
44 points (100.0% liked)
politics
22659 readers
174 users here now
Protests, dual power, and even electoralism.
Labour and union posts go to The Labour Community.
Take any slop posts to the slop trough
Main is good for shitposting.
Do not post direct links to reactionary sites.
Off topic posts will be removed.
Follow the Hexbear Code of Conduct and remember we're all comrades here.
founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
lol even Jackson is arguing against this, this is about to be a 7-0 decision RIP
Also damn Supreme Court justices can be stupid, never knew
You should check out the 5-4 podcast if you'd like to know more about how incredibly stupid SC justices can be. They go through a decision in each episode and tear it apart, it seems a lot of justices make 1L student level mistakes in their reasoning and writing pretty regularly.
Oh I’m well familiar with 5-4, great show
okay but have you listened to ALAB? also did some amazing takedowns of the federal judiciary
Every episode, multiple times, I understand their episodes take time and research but goddamn do they not release often
their two-parter on Dershowitz was physically uncomfortable, that man is a demon
Gonna make me relisten now, fuck that dude
thought about jump scaring you with the dershowitz emote but I can't do that to you comrade
Thank you, my heart couldn’t take it
They're like Ben Carson. Highly specialized in their education. But that doesn't mean they're geniuses. And can very much be the opposite despite the prestige.
A unanimous Supreme Court decision in the year of our lord 2025 would somehow be the least expected thing to happen this year.
Why not, let’s start off with a bang
The difference in interrogation between the SG and the TikTok attorney is wild
would you mind elaborating for those of us not up for bunch of C-SPAN?
Reading the other comments here is probably better, I was dropping in and out and just kept hearing “COMMUNIST China is taking our datas,” but apparently the justices actually were decently skeptical of the secretary general