this post was submitted on 07 Jan 2025
246 points (88.4% liked)

Not The Onion

12664 readers
830 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Comments must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Archive link

Not the hotdogs!

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 0 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago) (1 children)

https://www.rfa.org/english/news/korea/haircut-03262014163017.html that's not what radio free asia reports... so even if what you're saying is true, it's still radio free asia knowingly lying... and if the headline was "dumb socialist tv show tells people to have the same hairstyle as kim jong un" then it loses all impact.

Why doesn't radio free asia let us verify their claims with the evidence they must have gathered to make the report? Y'know, like a reputable news agency would?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

That's a different story from 2014, not about the 2005 broadcast.

Why doesn’t radio free asia let us verify their claims with the evidence they must have gathered to make the report? Y’know, like a reputable news agency would?

You might as well ask why journalists don't put targets on the backs of their anonymous sources by publicly identifying them. ALL reputable outlets sometimes use anonymous sources to protect the lives of people living in precarious situations. North Korea is not exactly known for treating citizens who talk negatively about how the government operates there well.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago)

If their source is "some guy said" that's not a credible report, even with a name.

If their anonymous sources are incapable of gathering evidence anonymously, they are useless sources.

Why don't they post evidence of their claims, they don't need to give names or anything?

A name wouldn't be evidence of anything anyway...

Also the fact that it's a different story from 2014 ruins your point not the other way around...