1403

The back-to-office backfire: Companies ending WFH perks lose out on top talent, who view flexible work as equivalent to an 8% raise (www.businessinsider.com)

submitted 2 years ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

156 comments fedilink hide all child comments

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.zip/post/1125686

Archived version: https://archive.ph/vL1mC
Archived version: https://web.archive.org/web/20230806071111/https://www.businessinsider.com/employees-work-from-home-benefits-as-good-as-raise-2023-8

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[-] [email protected] 9 points 2 years ago

A remote worker's worth is no less valuable than one who's onsite. If you want something like this to work then the employer should pay a differential for those who have to be onsite to compensate for the time and money spent commuting.

[-] [email protected] 3 points 2 years ago

So pay the WFF employee more than the WFH employee?

One way is baked in, the other is a topping, still damn near identical though

[-] [email protected] 0 points 2 years ago

Instead of the stick of paying people less from working home, they're getting a carrot for deciding to be there. That has a wildly more positive perception for workers IMO.

this post was submitted on 06 Aug 2023

1403 points (99.2% liked)

World News

36754 readers

628 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

Please only post links to actual news sources, no tabloid sites, etc
No NSFW content
No hate speech, bigotry, propaganda, etc

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]