this post was submitted on 16 Dec 2024
632 points (96.5% liked)

Comic Strips

12957 readers
1890 users here now

Comic Strips is a community for those who love comic stories.

The rules are simple:

Web of links

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 23 points 6 days ago (3 children)

If maximizing evil is the goal, killing the baker is the best thing you can do. Those people will eat some temporary bread and then go on starving. What’s worse, is more people will starve as well.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 6 days ago (2 children)

But then you need to set up a cult to keep on killing bakers, because there are incentives for someone else to take up the mantle.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 6 days ago (1 children)

or you take over operations, adulterate the bread with sawdust while selling the good stuff only to the 1% who can afford it. Also, maybe make it an overpriced subscription, where in order to have the privilege of buying bread, you also have to pay per loaf, too.

If that sounds like corpo-shit... that's because it is.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Then you might as well lightly poison the regular bread to keep the poor feeling like shit and preventing them from improving their life. You can still sell the premium, non-poisoned bread to the rich.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 days ago

also placing some of the antidote into "herbal" remedies. to make even more money off them.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 6 days ago

Now we're making progress towards a plan.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 5 days ago

Killing the baker isnt the best thing you can do

Start a cult where no one is allowed to eat bread, having to make all bread poisonous and placing it in a line

You would waste more resources compared to just killing the baker and reduce the risk of another person becoming the baker

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 days ago

Don't you mean "what's even better"?