Conservative
A place to discuss pro-conservative stuff
-
Be excellent to each other. Civility, No Racism, No Bigotry, No Slurs, No calls to violences, No namecalling, All that good stuff, follow lemm.ee's rules, follow the rules of your instance, etc.
-
We are a Pro-Conservative forum. Posts must have a clear pro-conservative, or anti left-wing bias. We are interested in promoting conservatism and discussing things that might get ignored elsewhere. All sources are acceptable, however reputable sources with a reputation for factual reporting are preferred.
-
Dissent is allowed in the comments, but try to be constructive; if you do not agree, then provide a reason which is backed up by references or a reasonable alternative interpretation of the provided facts. That means the left wing is welcome to state their opinions, but please keep it in good faith.
A polite request, not a rule, if you feel the need to report a comment, please don't reply to it.
view the rest of the comments
Rape is a crime. This was a civil trial. Civil trials don’t prove guilt.
He lost two cases against her for defamation related to the sexual assault. May be civil, but if you care that civil cases don't prove guilt, then I guess it means ABC didn't actually do anything wrong then.
You can't have it both ways.
That made me chuckle. You don’t understand civil liability vs criminal guilt.
Right. That’s why he just got 15 million because it was a true statement lol. It was a lie. Zero evidence of it.
Civil vs criminal. Rape is criminal. It isn’t a civil issue.
Saying Trump raped someone is false. That’s why they had to pay 15 million dollars. Read the article.
Nothing you said here is true.
They settled. No one ruled in Trump's favor...lmfao Rape is an act. Trump raped Jean You're arguing irrelevant semantics.
He is a sexual assaulter if you prefer that term.
They had to pay 15 millon dollars. That is what I said.
He is neither. Show where he was found guilty of either one.
If he didn't do it, then why did he lose the civil case?
Improper court direction. Why it’s getting overturned. The court was issued as a political tool and not for justice. You’ll see some people going to prison over this during the next four years
Oh I'm more than certain we'll see people getting persecuted by a politicised judicial system over the next four years.
That is false. That is incredibly false.
I explained to you. Rape is a crime. He was liable which isn’t the same thing thing at all. Don’t spread misinformation.
Liable for rape? Hmmm.
They know they couldn’t prove criminal rape. Considering she doesn’t even know the year, there is no evidence, etc. it’s an impossible task.
As such they funded a civil lawsuit after they changed the laws to allow it.
If anything you should find it concerning that anyone could say they were raped by another person with no proof and get Millions in dollars.
If you haven’t read on the case, you should. The amount of bullshit they had to do is amazing
I guess he shouldn't have raped her then.
No evidence he did. Why they are paying 15 million dollars for saying it. It’s a false statement since if it was true, they wouldn’t pay anything
Her judgement is going to get thrown out on appeal. The whole thing was an injustice.
R1