Conservative
A place to discuss pro-conservative stuff
-
Be excellent to each other. Civility, No Racism, No Bigotry, No Slurs, No calls to violences, No namecalling, All that good stuff, follow lemm.ee's rules, follow the rules of your instance, etc.
-
We are a Pro-Conservative forum. Posts must have a clear pro-conservative, or anti left-wing bias. We are interested in promoting conservatism and discussing things that might get ignored elsewhere. All sources are acceptable, however reputable sources with a reputation for factual reporting are preferred.
-
Dissent is allowed in the comments, but try to be constructive; if you do not agree, then provide a reason which is backed up by references or a reasonable alternative interpretation of the provided facts. That means the left wing is welcome to state their opinions, but please keep it in good faith.
A polite request, not a rule, if you feel the need to report a comment, please don't reply to it.
view the rest of the comments
Liable for rape? Hmmm.
They know they couldn’t prove criminal rape. Considering she doesn’t even know the year, there is no evidence, etc. it’s an impossible task.
As such they funded a civil lawsuit after they changed the laws to allow it.
If anything you should find it concerning that anyone could say they were raped by another person with no proof and get Millions in dollars.
If you haven’t read on the case, you should. The amount of bullshit they had to do is amazing
I guess he shouldn't have raped her then.
No evidence he did. Why they are paying 15 million dollars for saying it. It’s a false statement since if it was true, they wouldn’t pay anything