this post was submitted on 11 Dec 2024
353 points (97.3% liked)

Technology

60062 readers
3244 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

“It seemed doomed almost from the moment they decided to go to a sealed bid,” Judge Lopez said. “Nobody knows what anybody else is bidding,” he added.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

They wanted the sale to go to the Onion and not some conservative hate group more than the money. They were fully on board with taking the lower amount.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago

There’s a legal eagle vid that explains the math:

https://youtu.be/GmDNz7irGgw

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I’m no lawyer, but is that how these things work? The state is selling the company to pay a debt. The family owns the debt, not the company. They don’t get to decide how much value gets generated from the sale of the company. So it’s the states duty to maximize the proceeds.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago

The estate has a duty to maximize the value of the liquidation, and pay back creditors as best it can. Specifically to settle the debts.

While a creditor can't dictate the value of the estate, they can offer to forgive debt, which is the same for the purposes of the estate.

If the cancelled debt would have been worth more than the cash, then the creditors would be rightfully furious if the state instead sold the asset for less cash and paid them that way.

If you owe me $50k, and I tell you your watch is worth $5k to me, and instead you sell it for $250 and give me that while declaring bankruptcy so I don't get anything else, that's a terrible outcome for me, and great for you if you sold the watch to your friend who then gave it back to you in exchange for $250 later.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago

Yes, it is more complicated than just money.