this post was submitted on 27 Nov 2024
209 points (95.2% liked)

Technology

1574 readers
39 users here now

Which posts fit here?

Anything that is at least tangentially connected to the technology, social media platforms, informational technologies and tech policy.


Rules

1. English onlyTitle and associated content has to be in English.
2. Use original linkPost URL should be the original link to the article (even if paywalled) and archived copies left in the body. It allows avoiding duplicate posts when cross-posting.
3. Respectful communicationAll communication has to be respectful of differing opinions, viewpoints, and experiences.
4. InclusivityEveryone is welcome here regardless of age, body size, visible or invisible disability, ethnicity, sex characteristics, gender identity and expression, education, socio-economic status, nationality, personal appearance, race, caste, color, religion, or sexual identity and orientation.
5. Ad hominem attacksAny kind of personal attacks are expressly forbidden. If you can't argue your position without attacking a person's character, you already lost the argument.
6. Off-topic tangentsStay on topic. Keep it relevant.
7. Instance rules may applyIf something is not covered by community rules, but are against lemmy.zip instance rules, they will be enforced.


Companion communities

[email protected]
[email protected]


Icon attribution | Banner attribution

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

"The maps shouldn’t have shown that the bridge was complete."

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 187 points 1 month ago (3 children)

what if it was a paper map? would the mapping company be liable?

put the blame where it belongs; on the construction company who failed to block an unnavigable, dangerous piece of road.

[–] [email protected] 87 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Yeah I mean it would have been good if google maps could have prevented this but like the same thing could have happened to someone without a map

[–] [email protected] 47 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Yeah, I mean, someone has to provide the information. If one day, there’s a full bridge, and the next day it’s deconstructed for repairs, Google can’t magically know; some information needs to be pushed out to be parsed and updated. It wouldn’t surprise me if this was simply done by construction co. without proper filing etc. very few nations have the extreme regulations that U.S. has - it's one of America’s redeeming qualities. Of course, that may not always be the case. But yknow.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I suppose it depends on the locale, but I'm my experience, the cities I've lived in update the gis maps and send change updates to Google very regularly, where they sit unimplemented for months.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago

Yeah I can see that being a problem too. Shrug.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 month ago

I used to travel by paper map for like all of the 90s and 00s. I can reliably say, it was never the map's fault.

[–] dsilverz 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

A paper map doesn't route by itself, differently from map apps such as Google Maps, HERE Maps and OpenStreetMaps.

[–] [email protected] 43 points 1 month ago

It's completely irrelevant. It's not magic.

Blindly following directions without awareness of the situation around you is always your fault. A failure to block the road is the fault of whoever's responsible for the road, but never the map.