I don’t have words.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 154 points 2 years ago (18 children)

I'm not misremembering this, am I? He was like full-on outed as a pedo and then nothing happened?

  • source
  • hideshow 18 child comments
  • [–] 140 points 2 years ago (5 children)

    Yes, he was involved in trafficking underage girls across state lines

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 39 points 2 years ago

    visible-disgust

    that said burgerstan gets exactly the kind of representation it deserves... not what it needs (rather the opposite) but what it deserves, not justifying it but Trump's bringing all the true blue-blooded Real Americans™ into office, bald eagles and the founding fathers cry

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 76 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    Bill Clinton not only still walks the earth but was actively involved in Harris's campaign

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 39 points 2 years ago (4 children)

    If memory serves there was never anything concrete enough to bring charges, but a lot of smoke

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 50 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    They were going to bring charges but the primary witness was the victim, who is or was a sex worker. Since the defense would just say, "You can't trust a prostitute over a US representative.", they decided not to proceed.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 30 points 2 years ago

    Perhaps I missed some details, but I believe the argument was a bit different (but also probably included what you said). They wanted to use the other convicted pedophile, his buddy, but they feared a jury wouldn't trust a convicted pedophile. I think these were both effectively speculation though since the feds never formally acknowledged much of it. We saw the evidence and we knew they were pursuing charges... and then it went poof with little reason why

  • source
  • parent