this post was submitted on 08 Nov 2024
573 points (79.8% liked)

Political Memes

5428 readers
2074 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 5 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (3 children)

The missing votes are idiots who saw the bad lady talked about on YouTube, TikTok, and Twitter. Money buys opinions.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 4 days ago (2 children)

The mad thing about the result is that the Dems spent so much more money and still lost. Not that you can easily quantify the financial value of changing the algorithm on twitter to favour Trump.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 days ago

He's talking about the money Russia spent paying for tiktokers and youtubers to send corrupted ,messaging to the addicts.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Twitter, Washington Post, FaceBook, TikTok, YouTube: they all favored Trump. But YouTube may have just been unintentional as they are grossly incompetent and dont understand how their own algorithm leans into extremes.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Yeah good point, it was more than just twitter.

YouTube definitely know they have an issue and don't care, or they would do something about it. Radicalising people with extreme content increases engagement which makes them money, the only thing that will make them change it is regulation (with teeth).

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

That is fair that a person becoming radicalized does engage more, but it also turns a lot of people away from the platform and the loss of advertisers and users on Twitter is proof of that.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Except money evidently doesn't buy it by itself. If it did Harris would have won. Effective messaging (Where is the Dem Joe Rogan? They kicked the closest thing they have out of the DNC for expressing broadly popular opinions) and playing to the base of people willing to vote for you (Dems will never get those Republican voters no matter how many immigrants they promise to stop at the border) wins elections.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Right but if George Soros or the Disney Heiress owned Twitter it probably would be a lot closer.